Path drug takes through our body

 

Provide a bit of background about the behavior using references from the text (you may need to look up the behavior in the text appendix and read ahead about the behavior). Next, provide a brief definition of two theories from the list below: • Health Belief Model • Self-Efficacy Theory • Theory of Planned Behavior • Behavioral Theory • Transtheoretical Model • Health Action Process Approach Use this theory info to explain your behavior and inform your plan to change the behavior. Next, write about your plan to change this behavior, replacement activities, and how you will record your behaviors. There are numerous behavior modification tally sheets on the Internet, feel free to conduct a web search for behavior modification tally sheets and use an available sheet to record your behaviors and turn in as an attachment to your assignment, or feel free to make your own tally sheet with the categories indicated in the next paragraph. Next, implement the plan for two days and report about how it is going. P​‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‌‌‍​lease include information about the following areas in your paper: a. a. Specific behavioral goals b. Knowledge of when the behavior is most (or least) likely to occur c. Concrete plans to change the behavior d. Self-monitoring of the behavior e. Periodic evaluation of whether the plan is working Stick with the plan even after you turn in this assignment as you will be asked to provide an update on your adherence and behavior modification project in your final Signature Assignment, due in Week 8. Please include four scholarly resources in the paper. Use in-text citations for the resources in the paper and then include a reference page at the end of the assignment. Length: 5-7 pages Your paper should demonstrate thoughtful consideration of the ideas and concepts presented in the course by providing new thoughts and insights relating directly to this topic. Your response should reflect scholarly writing and current APA standards. Be sure to adhere to Northcentral University’s Academic Integrity Policy. The behavior of choice could be the topic of losing weight and/or healthy e​‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‌‌‍​ating habits.

 

 

 

 

 

I​‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‌‌‍​ncident: 72 yr old female Mrs Geraldine Berry sustained left fractured neck of femur (#NOF) and laceration to her head 5cm while walking her dog. Tripped on an uneven pathway. PMH: Hypertension and depression Current Medications: Coversyl 5mg Doxepin 25mg daily Atorvastatin 40mg daily SHx: Lives with elderly husband. Is the primary carer for elderly husband who has had a stroke previously and is mildly impaired. Attends church every Sunday and is responsible for arranging flowers for every Sunday service. She has started volunteering at the St Vincent De Paul’s Meals on Wheels distribution centre two days a week. She lost two children 5 years ago in a car accident. Geraldine is concerned who will look after her husband and their dog Nala. Geraldine and her husband have no children or relatives nearby. Current presentation Day 3 post op left total hip replacement, increasing pain in hip unable to weight bear, pain score currently 7/10. Geraldine has been prescribed oral tramadol tds, Ibroprofen prn, paracetamol prn, IV Amoxicillin 1000mg tds and Clexane 40mg SC BD. Suture line on hip appears red and swollen. Observations – 10am Day 3 Pulse Rate – 120 Respiratory rate – 22 Blood pressure – 120/80 Pain score – 7/10 Sa02 – 96% Temperature – 39.1 BGL – 6.8 mmol/l Glasgow Coma Score 15 Heat, pain and redness at suture site Refusing to mobilise due to pain NRSG258​‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‌‌‍​ Version 1 Feb 2021 Questions 1. Using the CRC and the information presented about Geraldine, identify the abnormal cues, and discuss why these are considered abnormal (200 words) (LO4). 2. Using relevant literature, discuss the pathophysiology related to the two postoperative issues of concern from the abnormal cues you have identified in question one (500 words) (LO1, LO4). 3. Using the template provided below, complete all the sections which include (200 words) (LO4, LO5): a. Identify the nursing goal for each identified issue/problem (2). b. List at least two nursing interventions for each issue/problem. 4. Using relevant literature, provide a rationale for the listed interventions and discuss how the interventions will be evaluated (500 words) ( LO1, LO3, LO4, LO5). 5. Identify 2 medications that were prescribed for the patient’s pre-operative condition. (Coversyl 5mg, Doxepin 25mg daily, Atorvastatin 40mg daily) used in this case study. Provide the mechanism of action, side effects correct dosage and contraindications for each medication. Explain how this might affect Geraldine in the post-operative period (400 words) (LO1, LO3, LO4, LO5). 6. Using the Roper-Logan Tierney Model, identify one (1) potential cultural/biopsychosocial issue/problem and discuss how this will affect the patient post-operatively or on discharge (200 words) (LO3, LO2). APA 7TH EDIT​‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‌‌‍​ION please.

 

 

56

Sample Solution

While such jurisdictions require amicus to have bona fide interest in the matter, our practice is that amicus ought to come into the proceedings on a foundation of neutrality; and by virtue of the express terms of the Constitution, parties with an interest in the proceedings are accommodated in the capacity of interveners.

Amicus participation is a matter of privilege, rather than of right. And “intervention” in a case, as provided under Rule 25 of the Supreme Court Rules, 2012 allows parties with sufficient interest in the matter to apply to be enjoined as interveners or interested parties. This avenue is set apart from that of amicus. As opposed to amicus, interveners have an interest in the rest of the suit, as to be affected by the resulting Judgment of the Court. Amicus curiae on the other hand, are “advisors to the Court”, and not to the parties, and are in no way bound by the resulting Judgment, except by way of precedent. Amici curiae cannot be perceived as an extension of the Court; and they are not to advance any party’s case, and ought not to extend their participation to the realm of interveners in any legal proceedings. The interposition of amici in judicial proceedings is terminated when they have put forward the points of law outlined in their amici brief.
There is, however, an exception in amicus interventions, in the case of advisory-opinion proceedings before this Court, as signaled in Re the Matter of the Interim Independent Electoral Commission, Sup. Ct. Const. Appl. No.2 of 2011. The absence of a live controversy in such proceedings opens a window for the amicus to steer the Court, by specific proposals, towards a definite legal position. The ultimate decision, however, lies with the Court.

In the High Court case, Justice Phillip K. Tunoi & Another v. Judicial Service Commission & 2 Others (op. cit) (at para.30), Mr. Justice Odunga had aptly observed, in relation to amicus status in Kenya today, thus:

“It is unfortunate that in this country, unlike in other jurisdictions with an advanced Constitution such as ours, we do not have in place comprehensive rules which govern the admission of persons as amici in legal proceedings

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.