Patrol vehicle’s capabilities

 

You are a member of a mid-sized metropolitan police department that has just been incorporated. The new chief of police would like to modernize the agency and get as much “bang for the buck” as she can. But, the chief is also concerned that the department is as effective as it can be. The agency has all of its normal issued equipment but would like to start with technology that is current. You are a recent college graduate and one of the youngest officers in the department. Right or wrong, the chief sees you a technology-savvy officer. The chief has tasked you to select 6 new technologies to enhance the department’s modernization. You will select 2 that impact the patrol vehicles, 2 that enhance the department’s nonlethal weaponry, and 2 that you consider the most valuable for investigative or operational use. The chief expects you to tell her the logic for you selecting the items you did.

Describe the 2 technologies that you would add to the patrol vehicle’s capabilities and why you chose them.
Explain what nonlethal weaponry you would add to the arsenal of the agency’s weapons and why they would be important to the mission function.
What are 2 components of technology that you think would be the most desirable to have for either investigative or operational activities? Explain in detail, and fully support your arguments.
Considering all 6 current technologies and equipment you selected, why did you select what you did, and how will it impact your agency’s mission? Explain.

 

 

 

 

Sample Solution

While exploiting at the outset on non-linguistic substances, semiology is requisite, to explore language in its path, not only as a theory, but also as unit, relay or signified. Semiology is perhaps doomed to be assimilated into a trans-linguistics, the materials of which may be myth, narrative, journalism, or on the other hand objects of modernization, in so far as they are spoken. On this note, the Roland Barthes (1964) came up with distinctive and widely acceptable elements of Semiology. They are;  Language and speech  Signified and signifier  Syntagm and systems  Denotation and connotation Language and Speech Barthes (1964) enforced the concepts of language, or the part of the Semiological system which is consented upon by society, and speech, or the individual choice of symbols, to Semiological systems. The application of these concepts can be supplied to the Semiological study of the food system. According to Barthes (1964), someone is free to create his/her own menu, using personal choices in food mixtures, and this will become their speech or message. This is done with the overall national and social structures of the language of food mind. Barthes (1964) then spread on Saussure’s terms, by explaining that language is not really socially determined by the masses, but is sometimes decided by a certain minute group of persons, somewhat changing the correlation of language and speech. Barthes (1964) exact that a Semiological system can importantly exist in which there is language, but little or no speech. In this case, Barthes (1964) was of the believe that a third element called matter, which would provide signification would need to be added to the language/speech system. Signifier and Signified

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.