Performance Management

Two short cases that discuss performance appraisal situations in organizations (based on real situations).
Answer the questions listed after each case. Your responses should be double-spaced and not exceed 1 page
per case.
Short Case 1: Company XYZ is a mid-sized R&D organization that is largely based on team work. As a result,
semi-annual performance evaluations are conducted at the team and not individual level. Team A received a
mediocre rating on the most recent performance evaluation. The manager explained that his appraisal was
objective and was solely based on the mediocre quality of the last two projects the team completed which was
also evidenced by mediocre customers’ evaluations. Although the team accepted the rating as very objective,
one team member expressed his strong disagreement. He said that his own contribution was error-free and he
should not be punished for the mistakes of his team members. He demanded to change his performance rating
from the mediocre to high.
1. As a manager, what would you do in this situation? What would be your response to the employee? Justify
your answer. [This is a reactive approach. You need to deal with the situation as it is.]
2. Proactively, would you do to avoid such situations in the future? Explain.
Short Case 2: Company ZYX is a small consulting organization with 40 employees. The manager who is
responsible for employee performance appraisal has a particular way of conducting it. He has a firm belief that
formal performance evaluations (with developed criteria, ratings, formal discussions etc.) are an absolute
waste of time and should never be done. Instead, he thinks that he is well familiar with each employee’s work
and achievements, and he can easily tell “what they are worth” by interacting with them and observing their
performance on a daily basis. As a result, the manager periodically stops at employees’ desks, talks to them,
asks about their progress on projects and discusses other work-related issues. Employees have a lot of daily
feedback and seem to like it. However, no written performance appraisal forms are ever filled in. When it
comes to pay raises and promotion, the manager makes his decisions and announces them to employees
during meetings.
1. Do you think this manager’s performance appraisal is sustainable in the long run? Explain your answer?
2. Would you suggest any changes in the manager’s approach to performance appraisal? Explain.

 

Sample Solution

Web servers

A Web server is a computer that runs Websites. It’s a computer program that distributes web pages as they are requisitioned. The basic objective of the web server is to store, process and deliver web pages to the users. However, web servers can be compromised for a number of reasons. Improper file or directory permissions is one of the reasons. The problem arises when incorrect file system permissions are set on files, folders, and symbolic links. When improper permissions are set, an attacker may be able to access restricted files or directories and modify or delete their contents. Setting your file permissions correctly may not save you from all attacks, but it will help make your site a bit more secure, making it a great addition to your current security measures.

Moreover, working in a group is about teamwork, people with different skills work on sudden parts that they are really good at and can get help whenever they need. Chitra Reddy demonstrates, “To solve complex problems and to complete difficult tasks, team works better than a individual.”. It drives people crazy when working in a group where there is no talking and freedom. People management skills that a group develops in order to communicate. Teamwork is not just work; it is about communication and motivation. People can’t just sit around when other people are working; there gets to be a purpose that they work in a group. When working in a group, people have to have a problem to solve; otherwise, they just aimlessly mess around. As it says earlier, people with different skills work on sudden parts does not mean they are good at those let them work on it individually. Teamwork is where members need encouragement to put their views across, make it exciting , interesting, and motivating.

Lastly, working in a group is that it enables the group as a whole to be more productive, more creative, and can get work done in small amount of time. Lynda Moultry Belcher emphasizes that,“Another key advantage of group work in the office is that it can increase efficiency”.Groups that work well together can achieve much more, creativity thrives when people work together. One of the benefits of working in a group is that it helps to raise the complete output. People work together using their best skills to make the quality better. A broader range of skills can be applied to practical activities plays an important role. Sharing knowledge excites others, makes them want to share more. Often, a group works well together because members rely on each other to bring individual talents to the business.

To conclude, working in a group helps improve skills such as communication

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.