Persia and the Greek City-States

PURPOSE OF PAPER: To investigate/research a topic and to analyze and draw conclusions about the historical significance of the event, personality, movement, or theme.
FAULTS & PENALTIES: Contractions such as, ‘isn’t; don’t; won’t; can’t; wouldn’t, etc. 3 point penalty per instance After 3 misspellings in the paper, 3 points per instance First person pronoun, 3 points per instance Slang, or informal speech 3 points per instance Paper length (excluding cover sheet or Works Cited or Endnotes) less than three full pages, 3 points per quarter page (at the sole discretion of the instructor) Submittal as a PDF, or Apple Pages, or any other format than Microsoft Word, 5 points Too many quotes — no more than 3 of two sentences or less permitted — 15 points

Sample Solution

The Persian Empire was one of the largest ancient empires in history. Established in 550 BC by Cyrus II (also known as Cyrus the Great), it stretched across much of Asia Minor into Mesopotamia and Egypt (Wiesehöfer). This immense empire would soon come into contact with the Greek city-states that were flourishing along coastal areas of modern day Turkey. The Greeks were particularly susceptible to Persian influence due to their geographic position adjacent to this powerful kingdom (West). Even before any direct contact between Persia and Greece took place; cultural diffusion between them had been occurring for centuries through traders who traveled back and forth along coastal regions near both countries (Khan Academy).

In 499 BC there was an uprising against Persian rule within Ionia – an area populated by several independent Greek cities along Anatolia’s coast – which resulted in military intervention from Athens with help from many other nearby states such as Eretria. Unfortunately for the Greeks however this attempt failed; leading Darius I to launch a campaign against all mainland Greece later known as ‘the Greco-Persian War’ or ‘Battle of Marathon’ after its most notable battle site (Barnes). This conflict ended with an Athenian victory but only served to illustrate how strong Persian power still was despite recent defeats elsewhere.

Despite continued tensions between them during subsequent years – such as Alexander’s invasion of Persia in 334 BC – there is evidence that some degree of mutual respect existed too: Herodotus claims that when Xerxes entered Athens he refrained from burning down its famed temples out of admiration for their beauty (Symeonoglou 22); while Achaemenid rulers could be quite amicable towards individual Greeks on occasion e.g Artabazus trusting Xenophon with military command over his sons’ troops during 401BC’s ‘Retreat from Babylon’. Despite all this turbulence though it was not until 330AD under Constantine’s rule that Byzantium officially declared itself Christian; symbolically marking end points for both classical era societies & beginning new ones marked by religious faiths rather than shared cultures/traditions/institutions like those which characterized previous interactions between them(Eder 70).

Throughout their histories together, Persians greatly impacted Greek architecture: evident today can be seen in splendid monuments like Persepolis–an extravagant palace complex built by Darius I–which combined traditional Hellenic designs alongside Iranian elements interspersed throughout its façade details & interior décor items alike(Rozin 128). Additionally concepts espoused within Zoroaster’s teachings—now commonly referred to as Zoroastrianism—became very influential within mainstream Christianity via Magi characters appearing prominently during Nativity stories about Jesus Christ being born&raised near Iran around Jerusalem specifically(Miles 93) . Lastly another area where Greece particularly benefited from contact w/Persia was philosophy; famous scholars Plato & Aristotle both studied extensively under leaders like Xerxes whose ideas regarding justice&government formed basis upon which early Western civilization models were based off.(Bury 391)

Overall interactions between these two great powers helped shape our current world significantly whether peacefully via trade networks or militarily through conflicts fought over time periods spanning multiple centuries: ultimately leaving us w/historical significance so vast it is impossible fully understand or appreciate just how interconnected they truly were then–let alone now!

regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating to take note of that while there is a limited ability to recall lumps of data, how much pieces in every one of those lumps can change broadly (Miller, 1956). Anyway it’s anything but a straightforward instance of having the memorable option huge pieces right away, somewhat that as each piece turns out to be more natural, it very well may be acclimatized into a lump, which is then recollected itself. Recoding is the interaction by which individual pieces are ‘recoded’ and allocated to lumps. Consequently the ends that can be drawn from Miller’s unique work is that, while there is an acknowledged breaking point to the quantity of pi

This question has been answered.

Get Answer