Personal and spiritual beliefs

at
Categories
Tags

 

 

Examining your personal and spiritual beliefs is necessary throughout your career as a counselor. The purpose
of self-reflection is to help counselors gain an understanding of their thoughts, feelings, emotions, and actions
so that they do not impose their beliefs on clients. This assignment will help you gain insight into your beliefs
and to help to identify alliance or conflict with the ACA Code of Ethics. Learning how to work through any
conflict because of your beliefs is important not to harm your client or violate ethical standards. This
assignment allows you to examine and apply steps to address the conflict.
INSTRUCTIONS
You will complete a self-reflective paper between your personal or spiritual beliefs and the counseling
professional values as depicted in the ACA Code of Ethics (available from
https://www.counseling.org/resources/aca-code-of-ethics.pdf). The paper should be 3–4 pages in length, APA
format, and include at least two references. The two required references are: Daniel (2020) and ACA Code of
Ethics (2014). Additional references are permitted, but not necessary.
This is a self-reflective paper and should be written in first person. However, please make sure that your style
remains professional. This is not texting, emailing, or FaceTime.
• Verify in one sentence that you read the Daniel (2020) text in its entirety.
• Choose two counseling professional values or codes from the ACA Code of Ethics that are in harmony with
your personal or spiritual beliefs. Do not choose obvious values, but values that maybe were not in harmony
until you progressed in this program or read Daniel’s text. Using the heading: Harmony Between Professional
Values and Spiritual Beliefs, write up to one page explaining the harmony between the professional values and
your spiritual beliefs.
• Using the heading: Integrating Professional Values and Spiritual Beliefs, write up to one page explaining how
these values and your spiritual beliefs came into harmony. What was this process for you? How were you
challenged to integrate the values and your beliefs? How did Daniel’s text challenge your thinking?
• Choose 2 counseling professional values or codes from the ACA Code of Ethics that still remain in conflict
with your personal or spiritual beliefs. Using the heading: Conflict Between Professional Values and Spiritual
Beliefs, write up to one page explaining the conflict that you still have to work through.
• Using the heading: Actions to Work Through the Conflicts, write up to one page reflecting on how you should
work through these conflicts and what this process should entail.

 

 

 

 

 

Sample Solution

development of World Trade Organization Jurisprudence.
a) US – Shrimp case
The countries, namely, India, Malaysia, Pakistan and Thailand lodged a complaint against United States for banning of importation of shrimp and shrimp products from the countries who lodged the complaint which was imposed by the US under Section 609 of US Public Law 101-162 stating that the ban was in violation of Article I, XI and XIII of the General Agreement on Trade and Tariff, 1994. The Dispute Settlement Body established a panel and the panel after concluding the hearings of all the parties, including the third parties, issued a report which was circulated to the members. The panel found that the import ban in shrimp and shrimp products as applied by the United States is inconsistent with Article XI:1 of the GATT 1994, and cannot be justified under Article XX of the GATT 1994.

The United States notified its intention to appeal certain issues of law and legal interpretations developed by the panel. The Appellate Body reversed the panel’s finding that the US measure at issue is not within the scope of measures permitted under the chapeau of Article XX of the GATT 1994, but concluded that the US measure, while qualifying for provisional justification under Article XX(g), fails to meet the requirement of the chapeau of Article XX. The Dispute Settlement Body adopted the Appellate Body report and the Panel report, as modified by the Appellate Body.

The case became significant because it was the first time the WTO recognized environmental protection as one of the objectives of international trading regulation. This case was probably not good for India specifically, but India’s active participation in the dispute shows that India was committed to follow the principles established by the World Trade Organization.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.
Hi, how can I help?