Abnormal brain development or damage at an early age can lead to neurodevelopmental disorders. Within this group of disorders, some are resolvable with appropriate and timely interventions, either pharmacological or nonpharmacological, while other disorders are chronic and need to be managed throughout the lifespan.
For this Assignment, you will develop a study guide for an assigned disorder and share it with your colleagues. In sum, these study guides will be a powerful tool in preparing for your certification exam.
To Prepare
• Your Instructor will assign you to a specific neurodevelopmental disorder from the DSM-5-TR.
• Research your assigned disorder using the Walden Library. Then, develop an organizational scheme for the important information about the disorder.
The Assignment
Create a study guide for your assigned disorder. Your study guide should be in the form of an outline with references, and you should incorporate visual elements such as concept maps, charts, diagrams, images, color coding, mnemonics, and/or flashcards. Be creative! It should not be in the format of an APA paper. Your guide should be informed by the DSM-5-TR but also supported by at least three other scholarly resources.
Areas of importance you should address, but are not limited to, are:
• Signs and symptoms according to the DSM-5-TR
• Differential diagnoses
• Incidence
• Development and course
• Prognosis
• Considerations related to culture, gender, age
• Pharmacological treatments, including any side effects
• Nonpharmacological treatments
• Diagnostics and labs
• Comorbidities
• Legal and ethical considerations
• Pertinent patient education considerations
Physicians used to be responsible for educating patients and assisting them in taking control of their own health, but today nurses take on the majority of this duty. Patients must be aware of their health and take steps to avoid or lessen consequences from any chronic illnesses if they are to actively participate in their own care. Patient education must be thorough and simple to comprehend. Nurse health educators must acknowledge that many patients lack the ability to comprehend information about health care and what they should do with it. It is extremely important to avoid re-hospitalization, especially in light of the steep fines assessed for early readmissions.
d apply to the standards of jus in bello. (Frowe (2011), Page 101-3). This recommends Frowe looks for a fair, simply battle between two members staying away from non-soldier passings, however couldn’t this prompt higher demise rate for warriors, as the two sides have somewhat equivalent opportunity to win since both utilize comparable strategies? By the by, ostensibly Frowe will contend that warrior can legitimately kill one another, showing this is simply, which is likewise upheld by Vittola, who states: ‘it is legal to draw the sword and use it against evildoers (Begby et al (2006b), Page 309).’ furthermore, Vittola communicates the degree of military strategies utilized, however never arrives at a resolution regardless of whether it’s legal to continue these activities, as he continually tracked down a center ground, where it tends to be legal to do things like this yet never consistently (Begby et al (2006b), Page 326-31). This is upheld by Frowe, who estimates the genuine strategies as per proportionality and military need. It relies upon the extent of how much harm done to each other, to pass judgment on the activities after a conflict. For instance, one can’t just nuke the psychological oppressor bunches all through the center east, since it isn’t just relative, it will harm the entire populace, an unseen side-effect. All the more critically, the fighters should have the right expectation in the thing they will accomplish, forfeiting the expenses for their activities. For instance: to execute all detainees of war, they should do it for the right aim and for a worthy motivation, corresponding to the mischief done to them. This is upheld by Vittola: ‘not generally legitimate to execute all soldiers… we should consider… size of the injury caused by the foe.’ This is additionally upheld by Frowe approach, which is significantly more upright than Vittola’s view yet suggests similar plans: ‘can’t be rebuffed just for battling.’ This implies one can’t just rebuff another on the grounds that they have been a warrior. They should be treated as empathetically as could be expected. In any case, the circumstance is heightened on the off chance that killing them can prompt harmony and security, inside the interests, everything being equal. Generally, jus in bello proposes in wars, damage must be utilized against soldiers, never against the honest. However, eventually, the point is to lay out harmony and security inside the republic. As Vittola’s decision: ‘the quest for equity for which he battles and the guard of his country’ is what countries sho