Pesticides and herbicide
Part 1 – What are the causes, impacts, and chemistry of your chosen pesticide/herbicide topic?
You can choose to complete Part 1 of this assignment as a vlog or blog. I have posted a
video to Brightspace demonstrating how to use Kaltura and MediaSpace, both provided
to all Riverland students, to create a vlog.
If you choose to write a blog, you will need to create a free account on
https://edublogs.org/. This is a free blog website designed for teachers and students to
use. You will write/create your blog post here. If you want to see a few examples of
blog posts, you can check out my edublogs site at https://chemmyslab.edublogs.org/.
Your submission should cover the following information:
• A summary of your chosen topic. This should introduce the reader to the topic and
provide them with a basis of knowledge that the rest of your submission builds on.
• A brief overview of the chemistry involved in your topic of choice. This may include
explaining the chemistry behind how your herbicide/pesticide works or is produced.
This chemistry should tie directly back to at least one topic discussed in this course.
• Discuss any pros and cons for your topic of research.
o If you are unsure how to identify the pros and cons of your topic of choice,
please see your instructor.
o Be sure to provide sufficient detail. Don't just provide a quick bullet point of the
pros and cons and not explain. A sentence or two is usually all you need to
elaborate on.
• Discuss possible benefits and impacts the herbicide/pesticide has on human health
and the environment. Some of these may appear to be pros and cons (and may
even be included in the list of pros and cons); however, details regarding these
benefits/impacts should be outlined in your submission.
• What are possible solutions to addressing this pesticide/herbicide issue you found in
your research? Are there any alternative options to using the herbicide/pesticide you
are researching? Outline any alternatives and assess their effectiveness.
• Explain, using supporting information, your opinion on the use of your topic. For
example, do you think continued use of the herbicide/pesticide is a good idea?
Should alternative options be utilized instead? Why or why not? What other ideas do
you have on this topic?
regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating to take note of that while there is a limited ability to recall lumps of data, how much pieces in every one of those lumps can change broadly (Miller, 1956). Anyway it's anything but a straightforward instance of having the memorable option huge pieces right away, somewhat that as each piece turns out to be more natural, it very well may be acclimatized into a lump, which is then recollected itself. Recoding is the interaction by which individual pieces are 'recoded' and allocated to lumps. Consequently the ends that can be drawn from Miller's unique work is that, while there is an acknowledged breaking point to the quantity of pieces of data that can be put away in prompt (present moment) memory, how much data inside every one of those lumps can be very high, without unfavorably influencing the review of similar number