Petrology and Geochemistry

 

Metamorphic Petrology

 

Deferral Coursework July-August 2021 – s

Answer all 3 questions in this workbook, then save the file as a PDF and submit this via the submission point in the Assment folder of GG536 on studentcentral.

Practical 1 Mineral Stability.
Consult lecture notes and read the following before attempting to answer questions
We need to know under what conditions minerals form and are stable to interpret the geological history of an area. Information is obtained by experimental or calculation and is generally presented in terms of a pressure – temperature phase diagram. Calculation of phase boundaries involves the use of thermodynamics, the study of the flow of energy, but it does not give any information about the rate of a reaction, that is given by the role of kinetics. In geological reactions the stable state with the lowest free energy is given by G (Gibbs free energy). A reaction is favoured if there is a decrease in G.
In the phase diagram below, in region X GCALCITE is less than GARAGONITE therefore the reaction aragonite → calcite is favoured in this region and visa-versa for region Y. On the phase boundary (marked by line A – B) X GCALCITE equals GARAGONITE.

 

 

 

 

The position of a phase boundary depends on the differences in density of two minerals and the degree of disorder of the minerals, which is expressed as entropy (S). Entropy increases as a substance passes from the solid state to liquid state to gaseous state. Entropy increases also increases as substances are mixed together. Reactions in which there is an increase in entropy tend to occur spontaneously. If we increase the pressure on a system it will favour the higher density phase. If we increase the temperature of the system it will favour the higher entropy (more disordered) phase.
Although many phases are thermodynamically unstable they persist because of an energy hurdle which makes their transformation extremely slow. For example most metamorphic minerals are thermodynamically unstable at Earth surface conditions but persist because they are metastable, requiring activation energy to progress the reaction to move the system to the stable state with the lowest free energy is given by G (Gibbs free energy). Related to this, minerals of the same composition but different crystal structures are polymorphs. In metamorphic petrology there are two types of transformation, ‘displacive’(involving only the bending of bonds), and reconstructive, involving the breaking and reforming of bonds. The type of polymorphic transition determines how sluggish or otherwise a polymorphic transition occurs.

 

 

 

 

Practical 1 Questions
The reaction between calcite and quartz to give wollastonite and carbon dioxide (vapour) is shown in the phase diagram above.
Which side possesses the higher entropy, calcite + quartz or wollastonite + CO2 state your reasons in the text box below

At what temperature does wollastonite + CO2 become stable at P = 1Kbar ?

Which has the higher entropy silica glass or crystalline quartz ?

Which has the higher entropy calcite or aragonite ?

Which has the higher entropy diamonds or graphite or coal ?

Why does aragonite occur at Earth surface conditions ? state your reasons
 

 

 

The figure above is the SiO2 phase diagram
Which phase has the higher density low quartz (trigonal) or high quartz (hexagonal) ?, state your reasons

Which phase has the higher entropy – low quartz or high quartz, state your reasons

Why can tridymite often be seen in hand samples at room temperature but high quartz never is ?

Which SiO2 solid phase shows the greatest density ?

 

Which SiO2 phase shows the greatest entropy ?

How many divariant fields are shown in the SiO2 diagram ?

The diagram above is the phase diagram for H2O
What has the higher entropy water or solid or gas?

How many degrees of freedom exist at the H2O triple point ? use the phase rule explain your reason

Practical 2: The Diagenesis Metamorphic Transition
Be sure to go through the virtual lecture before attempting this practical.

Sample K.I calibrated Sample K.I calibrated
S1 0.31 S6 0.41
S2 0.35 S7 0.38
S3 0.4 S8 0.36
S4 0.45 S9 0.31
S5 0.44 S10 0.29

The picture above shows folded turbidites with positions from which samples were acquired. The table above gives the x-ray diffraction Kubler Index for illite crystallinity. Which Kubler index zone(s)are present, approximately what temperature range have the rocks encountered, and how do the findings relate to the geological structure present. Answer in text box below

Practical 3 Geothermobarometry
Be sure to fully engage with the virtual lecture on Geothermobarometry before attempting this practical

Image courtesy J.Ciborowski
The above thin section sketch shows garnets with inclusions of biotite, plagioclase, kyanite, and quartz. The garnet, plagioclase and biotite were analysed by electron probe in the centre of the garnet (area 1) and in the vicinity of the rim of the garnet. The resultant data is presented in the table below, as wt% oxide and recast as formula units for the respective minerals. Use the formula units data for the following calculations.

Geothermometry

Very often, garnets become chemically zoned as they grow in a changing P-T field. Consider the assemblage garnet + biotite. Both of these minerals contain Fe and Mg that can be exchanged between them as temperature and/or pressure change. We can write an equilibrium constant, KD, for this reaction, that relates the ratios of Mg/Fe in both minerals at a given temperature and pressure. Some equilibrium constants are primarily a function of temperature. This is the case for Fe-Mg exchange between garnet and biotite.

KD =

Geobarometry

Some element exchanges involve minerals that have very different molar volumes (densities). The following reaction involves the exchange of Ca between plagioclase and garnet:
3 CaAl2Si2O8 (An in plagioclase) = Ca3Al2Si3O12 (Grossular in garnet) + 2 Al2SiO5 (Sil) + SiO2 (Qtz)
To measure the distribution of Ca in coexisting garnet and plagioclase we calculate the KD of the reaction:
KD =

Where XCa Garnet = (Ca /Ca + Mn + Mg + Fe) and XCa Plagioclase = (Ca / Ca + Na + K). Note that at high pressure there is fairly strong dependence of the exchange reaction on temperature. Therefore, to get an accurate determination of pressure an independent determination of temperature has to be made. Consequently the garnet-biotite Fe-Mg geothermometer is employed together with the GASP geobarometer. The diagram below shows contoured KD values for the GASP barometer (dotted line) and Garnet – biotite thermometer (dashed lines). The GASP barometer is generally considered accurate to ± 1.5Kbar, the garnet – biotite geothermometer ± 50°C.

Practical 3 Question
Employing the KD equations given for the GASP geobarometer and the Garnet-Biotite geothermometer and, working from the formula units values given for plagioclase, biotite and garnet in the table provided,
1. Calculate the P-T conditions for garnet growth in areas 1 and 2. Show your workings and plot the points on the P-T graph provided.
2. Briefly provide a hypothesis defining which metamorphic facies series the rock relates to and the likely tectonic setting in the text box overleaf

 

 

 

 

Sample Solution

Is Hillary Clinton Electable? GuidesorSubmit my paper for examination Hillary Rodham Clinton may turn into the principal female President of the United States of America—some time ago being the First Lady, a representative, and the Secretary of State—as she is running as an applicant in the 2016 presidential political race. It is significant, in this manner, to decide whether she is a degenerate lawmaker and should hold office as the President of the USA. From her various outrages, her acknowledgment of battle cash from lobbyists and organizations, and her misleading the overall population all the time, I trust Hillary Rodham Clinton ought not be chosen as President of the USA. On the off chance that one kinds “Hillary Clinton embarrassments” in any web crawler on the Internet, one will perpetually discover endless articles on her times of outrages even ones that are going on now, for example, the FBI test into her private email server as Secretary of State and her Clinton Foundation misdealings with accounts (McLendon, Inquistr). Despite the fact that Clinton is yet to be accused of a criminal offense, her incalculable embarrassments don’t show her in a decent light–particularly when she is a legal counselor and realizes how to evade the legal framework (Calabrese, Eohistory). The absolute most celebrated outrages she has been engaged with are: misusing the assault on the US office in Benghazi in 2011; the way that she gets paid $275,000 by and large for every open discourse; the Whitewater embarrassment, which began as a property undertaking and wound up as illicit advances, tax avoidance, and even a potential demise; and Filegate, which emerged in 1996, was an ill-advised access to FBI records that was arranged by Hillary Clinton (Gobry, The Week). Notwithstanding, Clinton has not been charged or captured for any of these outrages, considerably following quite a while of being confronted with claims. However, not being demonstrated blameworthy in court is definitely not a last sign of being guiltless (particularly with prominent individuals with enormous cash, for example, the OJ Simpson case, where the jury succumbed to the barrier’s stunts and didn’t follow the profoundly point by point DNA proof that was given (Quora). Be that as it may, if these outrages are insufficient to make you discouraged in deciding in favor of her, you should focus on the cash she takes from lobbyists and organizations to work for their exceptional advantages. Majority rules system Now! reports that, “As indicated by another report by Greenpeace, Hillary Clinton’s presidential crusade and the super PAC supporting her have gotten $138,400 from non-renewable energy source lobbyists and $1,327,210 from bundlers, totaling more than $4.5 million from lobbyists, bundlers and enormous givers associated the non-renewable energy source industry” (Cray, Democracy Now!). This is a clashing message that Mrs. Clinton is giving when she says she needs to work for environmental change (Hillary Clinton Campaign, Hillary Clinton). Also, she has gotten a large number of dollars from different huge enterprises, with the top organization, Soros Fund Management, giving her $7,039,900 (Open Secrets). On the off chance that she is taking this a lot of cash from lobbyists and enterprises, in what manner can an American resident trust she will work for the normal individual, rather than her rich and politicized contributors? Then again, however, the Clinton Foundation, which Hillary Clinton is effectively associated with, offers plentifully to mankind. “On account of our work, in excess of 31,000 American schools are furnishing kids with sound nourishment decisions with an end goal to destroy youth heftiness; in excess of 105,000 ranchers in Malawi, Rwanda, and Tanzania are profiting by atmosphere shrewd agronomic preparing, more significant returns, and expanded market get to; in excess of 33,500 tons of ozone harming substance emanations are being decreased yearly over the United States… ” (Clinton Foundation). Nonetheless, this equivalent Clinton Foundation has been blamed for misrepresentation and is as of now under tension by the US Congress to find a workable pace of their deceptive with outside countries in respect for pay-for-play ventures (Investor’s Business Daily). It very well may be said that Mrs. Clinton is an obsessive liar. She lied about being under expert marksman fire in Bosnia in 1996. Likewise, as indicated by American Thinker, “Mrs. Clinton lied about a video causing the Benghazi fear assault and is presently multiplying down, denying she deceived the exploited people’s families about the video, accusing her manufacture for the “mist of war. There’s is additionally her messages, which she lied going to Congress and the American individuals. These aren’t the unimportant manufactures about whom she was named after, however genuine bogus proclamations including loss of American life and traded off U.S. international strategy and national security” (Joondeph, American Thinker). Lying is certainly not an uncommon thing for Mrs. Clinton. William Safire of the NY Times wrote in 1996 that Hillary “is an innate liar.” He examined her trickery starting in Arkansas and all path to the White House: Travelgate, Whitewater, missing charging records, and lost FBI documents, to make reference to a couple of smoke screens (Joondeph, American Thinker). Indeed, even during the 1970s, Mrs. Clinton was terminated from her situation on the Watergate House Judiciary Committee over “lies and untrustworthy conduct” (Calabrese, Eohistory). Somebody who has a reputation of lying about such critical and touchy data ought not be chosen president. Another approach to see her lying is that by PolitiFact’s numbers, her lying is somewhat less than most government officials (PolitiFact). In any case, that isn’t motivation to expel her falsehoods, as lying in any example, particularly as a local official, isn’t dependable or reliable. And furthermore, Politifact and other mainstream sites for indicating realities have been found to have inclination (politifactbias). Despite the fact that Hillary Rodham Clinton is a commonly recognized name, her positivity evaluations are lower than any time in recent memory. Despite the fact that she has been the First Lady, the Secretary of State, and a New York state congressperson, this doesn’t mean she is electable. Indeed, she has had a series of outrages ascribed to her all through her political profession, she acknowledges gigantic totals of cash from lobbyists and enterprises, and she has lied on record to the American open and the US government on many occasions. Despite the fact that she may been winning the popularity based essential political decision right now, we can’t neglect her degenerate and pretentious conduct, particularly when she is as a rule at present researched by the FBI for her misusing of ordered data on her private email servers and for her Clinton Foundation money related misdealings. References Mclendon, Kim. “Hillary Clinton is Under Investigation by the FBI for More than E-Mail: If Elected, Could She Be Impeached?” The Inquisitr News. N.p., 17 May 2016. Web. 17 May 2016. Calabrese, Dan. “Hillary Rodham Clinton History.” Hillary Rodham Clinton History. N.p., n.d. Web. 17 May 2016. Gobry, Pascal-Emmanuel. “Hillary Clinton’s Litany of Scandal.” Hillary Clinton’s Litany of Scandal. N.p., 31 Mar. 2016. Web. 17 May 2016. Cray, Charlie. “The amount Money has Hillary Clinton’s Campaign Taken from Fossil Fuel Companies?” Democracy Now! N.p., n.d. Web. 17 May 2016. “Hillary Clinton’s Plan to Take on Climate Change.” Taking on the Global Threat of Climate Change. N.p., n.d. Web. 17 May 2016. “Hillary Clinton (D).” Opensecrets RSS. N.p., n.d. Web. 17 May 2016. Joondeph, Brain. “Blog: Is Hillary Clinton a Compulsive Liar?” Blog: Is Hillary Clinton a Compulsive Liar? N.p., n.d. Web. 17 May 2016. “For what reason was OJ Simpson Acquitted? What Factors Went into the Juror’s Decision? How Did the Prosecution Lose the Case?” – Quora. N.p., n.d. Web. 02 Aug. 2016. “About Us.” Clinton Foundation. N.p., n.d. Web. 02 Aug. 2016. EDIT2. “Outrage Without End: Is The Clinton Foundation A Fraud?” Investor’s Business

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.