-Reflect on your experiences, observations, and/or clinical practices from the last 5 years and think about how pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic factors altered his or her anticipated response to a drug.
-Consider factors that might have influenced the patient’s pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic processes, such as genetics (including pharmacogenetics), gender, ethnicity, age, behavior, and/or possible pathophysiological changes due to disease.
-Think about a personalized plan of care based on these influencing factors and patient history in your case study.
In addition to increasing age, other patient characteristics can influence pharmacokinetics and/or pharmacodynamics. Genetics play a major role in an individual’s reaction to medication; polymorphisms in cytochrome P450 enzymes can significantly reduce metabolism rate while certain gene mutations might cause drug allergies or sensitivities (Rindone et al., 2020). Gender is another factor that must be considered since physiologic differences between men and women impact absorption rates as well as enzyme activity levels (Grimm & Beyerse, 2018). Ethnicity should also be taken into account since some populations react differently than others do due cultural dietary habits or environmental exposure history. Lastly, any pre-existing pathophysiological conditions or substance use history could alter the way a drug is metabolized by the body or interact with its receptors negatively affecting efficacy (Rindone et al., 2020).
To conclude, it important consider multitude variables impacting person ’ expected responses drugs order ensure they receiving optimal care . While this list not exhaustive , understanding pharmacokinetic / dynamic factors influenced patient ’ response particular medication helps health professionals tailor treatments individuals taking into account personal preferences risk factors allowing customize approach patients best serve needs ultimately improving outcomes long run.
udents are expected to have the option to assess their work. During each programming task all through this series of examples to consolidate education and as a technique for evaluation, they were approached to compose a sentence of what each line is doing utilizing the key elements/terms in Python. Understudies are expected to do this as a feature of their GCSE Programming task.(APPENDIX Understudies WORK) Nonetheless, the outcome of this movement in advancing education was negligible during the principal example; more because of the outlook and inspiration of specific understudies, especially the lower capable understudies. A full reflection should be visible in (Example PLAN REFELCTION.) DWECK. Because of their program executing accurately; they didn’t want to assess what they had done. Without them doing this, they were not showing me that they had a comprehension of Python, aside from having the option to accurately duplicate code.
In OFSTED’s report ‘Further developing Proficiency in Optional Schools’ (2013) it expresses that ‘better education prompts worked on confidence, inspiration and conduct’. See reflection on example plan..) To get around this issue I found with composing the assessments, understudies told me verbally what their code did and I assisted them with developing their assessment. The more I did this they started to carry out this without anyone else. This could be connected to the absence of education abilities of certain understudies as proficiency isn’t just about having the option to compose however to likewise talk and tune in such that allows us to convey actually and figure out the world. (Public proficiency 2014). A proposal if I somehow happened to utilize this approach again is make some composing outlines for these understudies to assist them with building their assessments and some model assessments. This would be separated, however I could likewise furnish understudies with a showing of the assumptions which upholds the demonstrating approach the movement for the people who require it (Bandura1961).
Successively, the examples following on from this movements of every kind focussed on numeracy. Understudies need to have a vital comprehension of science to consolidate these abilities in to the programming exercises. Allude TO Writing HERE. For what reason DO Understudies NEED TO KNOW THIS. There are loads of chances in Software engineering when numeracy can be applied. In each action understudies led, they connected with genuine models (Supplement). As should be visible from understudies work, we began from the groundworks of essential expansion of two whole numbers then based on this once the establishments where set up. Showing Standard 4 expresses that as instructors we really want know about understudies’ capacities and their earlier information, and plan educating to expand on these (DfE, 2011). The example plans support this and it was crucial I had some awareness of understudies capacities and the series of examples based on their all around existing information. In the event that understudies needed numeracy abilities, they could never have had the option to advance through the exercises as understudies were expected to test the results of each program (understudy work). On the off chance that understudies don’t comprehend essential number frameworks, BIDMAS and information type’s stu