Pharmacology and Medicines Optimisation
Focusing on holistic care, and using contemporary theory, discuss how you would collaboratively work with your patient to achieve medicines optimisation; selecting one of the three scenarios provided.
You do not need to write the scenario out here, but state clearly which scenario you have selected.
Provide a brief background that includes the medication prescribed for the patient and, if applicable, any over the counter (OTC) medication taken by the patient. Provide an overview of medicines optimisation to inform the reader of your understanding using relevant literature to support.
Signpost the reader to the key elements for discussion in the main body, refer to module learning outcomes for further guidance.
Main body of assignment Critically discuss the therapeutic effect and potential side effects of the medications indicated in the selected scenario with reference to a wide range of published evidence. Incorporate your knowledge and align to the needs of the patient/person in the scenario (LO 2, 3)
Demonstrate a critical analysis of ways of working collaboratively with the person in the scenario with reference to informed choice in their decision making (LO 4).
Utilise underpinning evidence to explore issues related to adherence considering adverse effects and medicines optimisation of both medications in your chosen scenario (LO 3, 4)
To help structure your argument, consider using a framework for each paragraph, such as ‘Claim > Justify > Support >Implications’ (adapted from Mitchell and Riddle, 2000)
Summarise key learning points from the main body, and include any recommendations for future practice related to medicines optimisation.
Reference list Using Harvard referencing, and ensure that you identify the sources of material used, acknowledge the original author and include the reference in the text and in the reference list (see Cite them Right (Pears and Shields, 2010)) Not included in word count
Identify and demonstrate a detailed knowledge of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of the medications provided in the scenarios (LO 1, 2)
regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating to take note of that while there is a limited ability to recall lumps of data, how much pieces in every one of those lumps can change broadly (Miller, 1956). Anyway it's anything but a straightforward instance of having the memorable option huge pieces right away, somewhat that as each piece turns out to be more natural, it very well may be acclimatized into a lump, which is then recollected itself. Recoding is the interaction by which individual pieces are 'recoded' and allocated to lumps. Consequently the ends that can be drawn from Miller's unique work is that, while there is an acknowledged breaking point to the quantity of pi