Phenomenon of social change from multiple perspectives

 

This course addressed the phenomenon of social change from multiple perspectives, drawing on both classical and modern philosophy. Distinctive aspects and dimensions of the phenomenon of change were highlighted in Heraclitus’s philosophical writings and Aristotle’s Metaphysics. You studied the impact of a philosophy that created a change in a country (Animal Farm/Russia), philosophies to address a major social injustice (civil rights movement) and lastly, political philosophies that impacted government operations.
You will now incorporate all that you learned into creating your final paper.
You will now assume the role of the philosopher/leader as you look to create an approach to address a social justice issue of your choice. You are welcome to use any one of the three identified in your last paper or something that is more pertinent to your belief.
The final paper will be comprised of these areas:
–  Utilizing Heraclitus or Parmenides, (whomever you support) perspective, define the philosophy of change, its importance and relevance to the issue you are addressing.
–  Referencing Aristotle -four stages of change, how did this issue come about or what caused it to occur (where did it come from), what is the extent/severity of the issue (what it’s made of), the potential a change can make (potentiality) and what would the end results of the change cause or indicate (actualization)
–  Whose philosophy would you utilize to bring about the change: Malcolm X, Huey Newton, or MLK and why?
–  Identify 3 strategies or objectives that you feel would bring about a change and why?
–  Would you incorporate government assistance and why or why not?

 

Sample Solution

Heraclitus believed that change was a fundamental feature of the universe, that everything is in constant flux and nothing remains the same. He also argued that all things must come to pass, no matter how much we wish it otherwise. His philosophy on change therefore emphasizes the importance of accepting change as an inevitable part of life and learning to embrace it instead of resisting it. For example, when addressing social justice issues such as poverty or inequality, Heraclitus’s view can be used to remind us that these problems will never go away entirely but rather must be constantly addressed with new approaches from multiple angles if real progress is going to be made. This understanding allows us to make more effective decisions by realizing there is not just one solution but rather recognizing small changes can lead up larger improvements over time.

regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating to take note of that while there is a limited ability to recall lumps of data, how much pieces in every one of those lumps can change broadly (Miller, 1956). Anyway it’s anything but a straightforward instance of having the memorable option huge pieces right away, somewhat that as each piece turns out to be more natural, it very well may be acclimatized into a lump, which is then recollected itself. Recoding is the interaction by which individual pieces are ‘recoded’ and allocated to lumps. Consequently the ends that can be drawn from Miller’s unique work is that, while there is an acknowledged breaking point to the quantity of pi

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.