Sample Solution
It was the year 2117 and the world had changed drastically. Scientists and philosophers alike had made incredible advancements over the past centuries in understanding what it meant to be human. The most controversial of these advances was the discovery of the three theories of identity: physical, psychological, and bundle theory.
It all started with a group of scientists who developed a new type of quantum computer that could connect directly to their user’s brain enabling them to experience digital reality as if it were their own home. This remarkable advancement left many people wondering how exactly this technology would alter our perception of humanity. After much debate, three distinct theories emerged regarding identity: physical, psychological, and bundle theory.
Physical theorists argued that one’s identity is based solely on their body – any changes or modifications would mean an alteration in identity as well. Psychological theorists disagreed – they believed that one’s thoughts and emotions are more important than any physical changes when determining identity. Lastly, bundle theorists proposed that both physicality and mentality should be taken into account when assessing someone’s identity.
No one could have predicted what happened next – after continued use of quantum computers by humans, scientists discovered that users eventually adopted characteristics from both digital worlds they visited as well as from other users within those same digital realities (Minsky 1987).Thus began an unprecedented period where individuals found themselves adopting various aspects from others around them regardless of whether it came from a virtual environment or not (Lee 2017). This lead to massive upheavals in global society for better or for worse.
This strange evolution ultimately profoundly altered our understanding of human existence forever – no longer was there just one single method for determining someone’s true self but now multiple options which allowed us to explore new possibilities with regards to how we view ourselves and our place in this ever-changing world.
The Revenger’s Tragedy
Misfortune of Avengers What sort of misfortune is this? By definition, the misfortune is “a staggering, excruciating, dismal occasion”. Notwithstanding, the awfulness of Avengers doesn’t uncover every one of these highlights. It is frightful and abnormal, loaded with wicked, brutal, dead and maniacal grisly clarifications, however this is certainly not a dismal story. Instead of cause the crowd to feel distress, they regularly draw mind blowing doubtful feelings. The reason for the misfortune isn’t inefficient sorrow, however to utilize retaliation as a persuading intends to cause contempt.
Shakespeare’s “Hamlet” shows the overall components found in the awfulness of the retribution of the renaissance (“misfortune of vengeance”). Be that as it may, despite the fact that Hamlet is a misfortune of vengeance, Shakespeare confounds the essential retribution plot by making three vengeance plots. By including significant advancements, Shakespeare makes ‘Ship of the Concentric Revenge Miwa’ (Frye 90) which is definitely not a physical legend yet a phantom, not an apparition, yet a scholarly saint who is an issue. did. viewpoint
In this investigation of retribution and vengeance of Elizabeth ‘s vengeance, the two plays I see are the “Hamlet” of William Shakespeare and “The Tragedy of Avengers” of Thomas Middleton. After first observing the treatment of the dramatist ‘s Avengers’ character, different characters in the play will deal with the Avengers. Despite the fact that their essential topic and shows are comparable, the two plays show a differentiating picture of vengeance; rather than “Vindicator’s misfortune”, Hamlet is an increasingly complex of his hero Provide treatment restricted by the creator’s social data and lacking
The awfulness of vengeance (some of the time called retribution dramatization, vengeance show or grisly misfortune) is a sort of hypothesis whose fundamental subject is the deadly aftereffect of vengeance and retribution. American instructor Ashley H. Thorndiek formally reported the awfulness of vengeance in the 1902 article “Connection among Hamlet and contemporary retribution show”, recorded the advancement of the hero’s retribution plan, and frequently killers and Avengers Brought about his own passing. This sort previously showed up in the early current British distributed by Thomas Kid’s “Misfortune of Spain” in the last 50% of the sixteenth century. Early works, for example, Jasper Heywood ‘s Seneca (1560’ s), Thomas Norton and Thomas Sackville ‘s play Gorbuduc (1561) were additionally viewed as a misfortune of vengeance. Different misfortunes of renowned retribution incorporate the awfulness of William Shakespeare’s Hamlet (1599-1602), Titus Andronics (1588-1593), Thomas Middleton’s Avengers (around 1606).
