Philosophy Bites Podcast

 

Here is a blurb about the podcast from Wikipedia: “Philosophy Bites is a podcast
series featuring philosophers being interviewed for 15–20 minutes on a specific
topic. The series, which has been running since 2007, is hosted by Nigel
Warburton, freelance lecturer, and David Edmonds…The podcast has been one
of the top 20 most downloaded series in the United States and has over 34
million downloads.”
For the essay assignment, you should do the following:
• Choose one of the podcast episodes that is on a topic of interest to you
from the list below (all the way at the bottom of these instructions); you
may want to listen to a few before deciding on one.
• Write an essay that summarizes the podcast episode (your summary
should only be one paragraph that gets at the main ideas of the episode).
In addition to discussing the podcast, your essay must include reference
to/discussion of at least one reading from our text that relates to the
topic of the podcast episode, as well as at least one reference
to/discussion of an article/entry (also related to the podcast episode) in
either The Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy or The Stanford
Encyclopedia of Philosophy, through quotation and/or paraphrase.
• Your objective for this essay is to inform your reader about whatever
concept/topic/philosopher/problem is discussed in the podcast; the
essay should be informative, not persuasive.

 

Sample Solution

‘Financial matters has never been a Science – and it is even less now than a couple of years prior.’ Paul Samuelson portrays how financial specialists like to allude to their hypothetical models – those which have negligible connection to this present reality, for they can’t think about the silly human conduct on state or macroeconomic undertakings. Rethinking a variety of fields in uncommon ways is basically the way that Artificial Intelligence has caused upon a few ventures, just by utilizing a bunch of strategies to break down information to settle on additional very much educated deductions and conclusions about our reality. To connect two differentiating universes – Economics and Artificial Intelligence – would maybe balance a contention that Economists taking care of financial issues would have a seemingly emotional commotion since Adam’s Smith origin of Economics, helping humankind in settling a scope of issues. As both created and emerging nations anticipate moving towards an experienced economy, there will be a few developing worldwide issues that financial specialists need to settle inside the following 20 years. While it is irrefutable that Economists should assist with taking care of a few developing worldwide issues inside the following 20 years with economies moving towards soundness, it is, notwithstanding, problematic and more right to ponder on whether Artificial Intelligence will be the vessel for our economy to be more adequate and supportive practically speaking.

Taking into account the quick development in the worldwide populace, there has been an expansion in backing for the environment emergency and the constraints brought about by over-double-dealing of assets in our round economy. Every one of these are, incontestably, the implication of the past modern double-dealing and huge scope monetary difference where nineteenth century pioneer domains set out with the aim of pillaging normal assets in unfamiliar nations, heartlessly taking advantage of capital and land – all disregarding the impacts of the quick exhaustion of assets expected to help the sensationally enormous regular populace development in the impacted district. While the Industrial double-dealing is evidently the primary driver adding to destitution and insta

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.