Plato apology

1. IN your own words, explain what you think Socrates means by the claim “the life which is unexamined is not worth living”. Do you agree with him? Why or why not?

2. Imagine you are the philosopher (the prisoner who got away) in Plato’s allegory of the cave. After discovering things on the outside, would you return to the cave in order to explain things and/or help the prisoners? If so, what would you do or say to them? If not, why not?

Sample Solution

Plato apology

Socrates was considered by many to be the wisest man in ancient Greece, his spoken words are still listened to and followed today. The quote, the life which is unexamined is not worth living, is from the Apology and while most people take Socrates to be talking about the need for self-reflection in a meaningful life, it actually means something a little different in his speech. Through this statement, Socrates means that an unexamined human life is deprived of the meaning and purpose of existence. Socrates believed that philosophy, the love of wisdom, was the most important pursuit above all else. He exemplifies more than anyone else in history the pursuit of wisdom through questioning and logical argument, by examining and by thinking.

for $25,000 is enforceable is dependant upon the validity of the contract. Oral contracts are typically enforceable unless they fall under the statute of frauds, which requires certain contracts to be in writing. This includes several requirements, including the sale of goods over $500. However an exception to this rule is speciality items. If a manufacturer agrees to create specialty items for a client, once they begin to manufacture the goods, the contract is enforceable without a written agreement. Here, Lake was selling a $25,000 sound system to Soames, which falls under the statute of frauds and would typically require a written agreement. However, since Lake made the sound system personalized for the band’s “detailed specifications,” Soames is required to pay for it because it is not suitable for sale to another customer. Thus, Peter Lake is right about the enforceability of his contract with Pearly Soames for the sale of the sound system, and Soames is required to pay him for it.

Lake and Penn Offer

Whether or not Lake is entitled to the position offered by Beverly Penn depends on if a valid offer was made to him to begin with. In order for an offer to be valid and binding, it must be clearly communicated, including definite terms. This includes the willingness of the offeror to enter into an agreement, the offeror’s intent to form a binding contract, and the explicit communication of the offer and the terms to the offeree. On April 6, Penn wrote to Lake, “…Come on board right away, and I will sell you half of my business for $150,000…” Penn clearly stated the conditions of the sale and the letter was received by Lake. Penn showed an intent to enter into a contractual agreement with Lake. Accordingly, Penn did make a valid and binding offer to Lake to sell a portion of her business to him for $150,000.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.