“”Poem ABC”” by Poet Lady

 

Trifles is a one-act play. For the final exam, you will write act two (and acts three, four, five, and more, if you want).

As act one of the play ends, Mr. and Mrs. Peters (the sheriff and his wife) and Mr. and Mrs. Hale (the Wright’s neighbors) are leaving the Wright’s house. Mr. Henderson, the country prosecutor, has stayed behind at the Wright’s house because he’s “”not satisfied,”” and he wants to go over everything again.

Think: start your act two exactly where act one ends and answer the question: what happens next? You decide.

1.  What was your first reaction to the poem?  Did you find it difficult to read?  Or did you find it easy?  Did you understand it all at once?  Or did you have to read it a number of times to get the meaning?  Did you find the paraphrase helpful or unnecessary?
2.  What stood out to you when you were reading?  Were you drawn to any parts in particular?  If so, which parts and why did they stand out?
3.  Was this a poem you can relate to?  If so, how?
4.  Did you enjoy reading and hearing the poem recited aloud?  If so, why?  If not, why not?
5.  Do you have any other comments you would like to share with the group?” 3 https://www.homeworkmarket.com/fields/literature?page=3

 

Sample Solution

their desires, which is not morally good. An example being if a shopkeeper gave their customer the correct amount of change; if they did this out of fear of being caught out by giving their customer the wrong the change then the act is not a generally good act however if they returned the correct change not thinking about the consequences but doing it for the right reason and purely out of respect for the moral rules. Morality is a system of rules that you place on yourself; moral rules come to us, as we are rational beings. Some reasons we cannot ignore and apply to everyone.

Categorical imperatives are maxims; this being rules that you have to do all the time regardless of circumstances. Kant provides three different formulations about the categorical imperatives. The first of the three formulations is universalisation he writes ‘ I ought never to act except in such a way that I could also will that my maxim should become universalised’. By saying this he states that one should only act in a way that makes sense for you but also in a way that is considerable and would allow everyone else to act in the same way. A person’s moral law is their will and must be consistent. An example being one must not lie, this is an important maxim as if everyone told small white lies the world would be corrupt and honesty would be a useless trait as lies would be the norm and the truth would be lost in translation. It can be believed that our actions are merely us seeking pleasure and avoiding pain however Kant presents a clear explanation in ‘Groundwork of a Metaphysic of Moral’ where he argues against this point by stating that if pleasure were the only thing to motivate our actions then we would be only have instinct to guide us, as instinct suffices for obtaining pleasure.

The second of the three formulations is to ‘act in such a way that you treat humanity, whether it is in your own person or in the person of another, always as an end, and never simply as a means’ this conveys that one should always respect other peoples status as beings in the moral worth and respect ourselves. Its understandable an example being taxi drivers, nurses and baristas are the means to the end of whatever services they’re providing however this is allowed as the service is provided voluntarily and not in a way which ultimately forces or takes away their free will. Therefore in summary of the second formulation, this is to not use people as means to and end.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.