Watch the video interview below from a series hosted by San Francisco’s Museum of the African Diaspora
Links to an external site., and then write a 250-word response:
Claudia Rankine (poet, essayist, playwright) – https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b1FJUNm15e8&t=2390s
The response should be a personal reflection on the ideas raised in the interview, not a thumbs up/thumbs down review. Try to make sense of your reaction to the discussion in a thoughtful, concise way.
regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating to take note of that while there is a limited ability to recall lumps of data, how much pieces in every one of those lumps can change broadly (Miller, 1956). Anyway it’s anything but a straightforward instance of having the memorable option huge pieces right away, somewhat that as each piece turns out to be more natural, it very well may be acclimatized into a lump, which is then recollected itself. Recoding is the interaction by which individual pieces are ‘recoded’ and allocated to lumps. Consequently the ends that can be drawn from Miller’s unique work is that, while there is an acknowledged breaking point to the quantity of pi