Policy Advocacy Project

 

Arrange a meeting or phone call and speak with the elected official or staff member or assistant that you identified in the Policy Advocacy Project Part A: Proposal to advocate for the legislation you selected (See attached Part A paper). Make sure to complete all the requirements specified in this assignment.
Part I: The Meeting • Meet/call the elected official or staff member/assistant to discuss the legislation.
• Do not mention that you are a student or that you have arranged this visit as part of a course requirement.
Part II: The Report Write a report of your visit and include all the items listed below. The report should be written in an academic manner that uses standard grammar, punctuation, and spelling. However, APA format is NOT required, nor a reference list.
1. Include the exact name of the elected official or staff member whose office you visited and the person with whom you spoke.
2. Indicate whether the elected official or staff member was familiar with the legislation. See Part A
3. Describe how you conveyed your issue in the meeting. Summarize the topic and how you presented the topic, including what facts or supporting information that you provided. Once you lay out the issue, you should ask for the legislator’s support.
4. Summarize the elected official’s or staff member ‘s response to your request; namely, will the legislator provide the requested support or not? If not, why not? If the individual can support your position, you should elaborate why he or she was so enthusiastic about showing support (so that we might convey that enthusiasm to other less enlightened legislators).
5. Describe how the meeting ended. Was there additional information that you needed to send the elected official or staff member?
6. Summarize the elected official’s or staff member’s demeanor. Was he or she cordial, merely civil, barely engaged, etc.? In other words, despite your anxiety about the meeting (which is common for most nurses), did the individual seem agreeable to having the discussion? For example, did he or she: • Seem interested in the topic? • Ask good questions? • Seem candid about their position or remain noncommittal? • Seem pleasant, easy to talk to versus merely civil versus confrontational? • Relate any experiences that contributed to his or her understanding about the topic (e.g., has a family member in one of the health professions or some other relevant personal experience). If so, did these experiences help the individual to support your request or did it have the opposite effect?

Sample Solution

methods. She found “a lack of correlation between students’ self-assessments and teacher ratings” (p.329). Préfontaine also states that one of the limitations of her study is the lack of qualitative data. Additionally, Ross (1998), in a meta-analysis of studies investigating self-assessment in L2 learning, asserts that one of the main limitations to self-assessment studies is the lack of qualitative-oriented studies. This study will contribute to investigating validity and reliability of self-evaluations, in an effort to alleviate these inconclusive results due to lack of theory and methodological dead ends. Self-evaluations, in this study, targeted two specific features of French pronunciation: segmental /y/ vs /u/ and segmental/suprasegmental “silent e” (or schwa). These two features have been chosen as variables because they are critical to learners’ intelligibility and comprehensibility. Munro & Derwing’s (1995) Intelligibility/ Comprehensibility principle asserts that intelligibility is the extent to which a given utterance is understood by the learner, while comprehensibility is the learners’ perception of how well they understand an utterance. Methods Participants and sampling The study took place at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign. L2 students in a French phonetics course were recruited to participate in the project via an in-class introduction and follow-up emails. The tasks were integrated into the structure of the French phonetics course, and all students in the course were expected to complete these tasks. The instructor of the course was not a member of the research team. The Fall 2016 French phonetics course had two sections, one section was the contro

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.