Policy debate.

 

 

 

 

You have been hired as a consultant or adviser and have been asked to provide/present a document that outlines the importance of choosing an
alternative or course of action in a policy debate. The policy brief should have 2500 words (excluding bibliography, 1.5 spaced, use 12-inch
font). Consult with the professor on what specific topic you have chosen to focus on. There are two target audiences or actors from which you
will have to pick one: 1- The U.A.E. government or one Emirate (predominately domestic/national security issues); 2- The U.N. General Assembly
(international/transnational security issues). There is a multitude of security threats that have been preoccupying policymakers at various national,
regional, and international levels. Your task is to highlight one specific security threat that you feel is of utmost importance and discuss specific policy
recommendations that could help solve that problem. Outline of what a policy brief should look like and what it needs to address: 1. Issue: Give a concise, onesentence statement of the issue and the respective target audience you are addressing. 2. Background: This section should focus
on the context and the importance of the issue. Provide a good overview of the root causes of the problem at hand. The aim is to convince the target
audience that a current and urgent problem exists which requires them to take action. 3. Analysis: This section should summarize the policy options that exist and what has been done about the problem so far. You should discuss the pros and cons of the various policy options. Provide decisionmakers
with no more than three potential courses of action. 4. Recommendation: The policy recommendations element aim to provide a convincing proposal of how certain current policy approaches need to be changed or modified. This section should address specific practical steps or measuresthat need to be
implemented. Why are the recommendations you have suggested best suited to deal with this problem at hand? 5. Sources: List your sources ( 10 or more) it is always good to include some of primary source.

 

 

 

 

Sample Solution

While exploiting at the outset on non-linguistic substances, semiology is requisite, to explore language in its path, not only as a theory, but also as unit, relay or signified. Semiology is perhaps doomed to be assimilated into a trans-linguistics, the materials of which may be myth, narrative, journalism, or on the other hand objects of modernization, in so far as they are spoken. On this note, the Roland Barthes (1964) came up with distinctive and widely acceptable elements of Semiology. They are;  Language and speech  Signified and signifier  Syntagm and systems  Denotation and connotation Language and Speech Barthes (1964) enforced the concepts of language, or the part of the Semiological system which is consented upon by society, and speech, or the individual choice of symbols, to Semiological systems. The application of these concepts can be supplied to the Semiological study of the food system. According to Barthes (1964), someone is free to create his/her own menu, using personal choices in food mixtures, and this will become their speech or message. This is done with the overall national and social structures of the language of food mind. Barthes (1964) then spread on Saussure’s terms, by explaining that language is not really socially determined by the masses, but is sometimes decided by a certain minute group of persons, somewhat changing the correlation of language and speech. Barthes (1964) exact that a Semiological system can importantly exist in which there is language, but little or no speech. In this case, Barthes (1964) was of the believe that a third element called matter, which would provide signification would need to be added to the language/speech system. Signifier and Signified

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.