Politicians use logical fallacies to persuade listeners during their speeches

Sample Solution

When watching a public speech given by the President of the United States, Donald Trump, I noticed several logical fallacies throughout his address. To begin with, he often resorted to using ad hominem attacks against anyone who disagreed with him or questioned his decisions (Trump 2020). This type of fallacy involves attacking someone’s character or moral worth instead of addressing their argument and is intended to discredit them without actually providing evidence for why they are wrong (Stanford Encyclopedia Of Philosophy 2018). Furthermore, this tactic seeks to persuade listeners by painting any opposing views as illegitimate since those individuals are deemed untrustworthy or immoral. In addition, another logical fallacy used during this speech was an appeal to emotion. For example, when discussing immigration policies he often painted illegal immigrants in a negative light by suggesting they were criminals and posed a danger to society even though there was no hard evidence supporting these claims (Trump 2020). By invoking fear amongst listeners – especially amongst those already holding anti-immigrant sentiment – it helps lend support for the policies being proposed rather than having arguments based on facts. Another common fallacy used by President Trump is slippery slope arguments. This happens whenever he talks about topics such as gun control where he suggests that imposing certain restrictions will lead down a path towards complete disarmament despite there being little proof supporting this claim (Trump 2020). By creating false scenarios designed create panic in listeners it serves as an effective way to sway opinions without reasoning from actual data. Finally, President Trump often uses whataboutery which occurs whenever he deflects criticism away from himself onto other politicians instead of directly addressing the issue at hand (Trump 2020) This form of logical fallacy attempts divert attention away from whatever topic is being discussed so people focus on something unrelated. As such it allows him avoid having defend his own actions while simultaneously putting others politicians in bad light. Overall then, listening through President Trump\'s speeches reveals many examples of logical fallacies ranging from ad hominem attacks appeals emotions all way whataboutery . Since these techniques rely on manipulation rather than factual information it becomes important aware how rhetoric can be used mislead audiences into accepting ideas uncritically.

tion in the future. This highlights that student motivation is both a cause and a consequence. This assertion that engagement can cause changes motivation is embedded on the idea that students can take actions to meet their own psychological needs and enhance the quality of their motivation. Further, Reeve, J. (2012) asserts that students can be and are architects of their own motivation, at least to the extent that they can be architects of their own course-related behavioral, emotional, cognitive, and agentic engagement.

Synchronous and Asynchronous Learning

The COVID-19 pandemic brought a great disaster on the education system around the world. Schools have struggled due to the situation in which led them to cessation of classes for an extended period of time and other restrictive measures that later on impede the continuance of face-to face classes. In consequence, there is a massive change towards the educational system around the world while educational institutions strive and put their best efforts to resolve the situation. Many schools had addressed the risks and challenges in continuing education amidst the crisis by shifting conventional or traditional learning into distance learning. Distance learning is a form of education through the support of technology that is conducted beyond physical space and time (Papadopulou, 2020). Distance learning is an online education that provides opportunities towards educational advancement and learning development among learners worldwide. In order to sustain the educational goal of our country, distance learning is a new way of providing quality education as much as possible among public and private institutions especially to those pursing in higher education. The instructional delivery in considering distance education can be through synchronous or asynchronous mode of learning, in which students can engage and continually attain quality education despite of the pandemic situation. Based on the definition of Easy LMS Company (2020), synchronous learning refers to a learning event in which a group of participants is engaged in learning at the same time (e.g., zoom meeting, web conference, real- time class) while asynchronous learning refers to the opposite, in which the instructor, the learner, and other participants are not engaged in the learning process at the same time. Thus, there is no real-time interaction with other people (e.g., pre-recorded discussions, self- paced learning, discussion boards). According to article issued by University of Waterloo (2020), synchronous learning is a form of learning that is live presentation which allows the students to ask questions while asynchronous can be a recorded presentation that allows students to have time in reflecting before asking questions. Synchronous learning is a