Practical challenges with active and passive euthanasia

Sample Solution

I agree with euthanasia provided it is done in certain situations and under certain conditions. In my opinion, it should only be considered when a patient is facing an incurable and terminal illness that causes immense suffering or pain with no reasonable chance of recovery or improvement. This decision should not be taken lightly as it is an irreversible action, thus it must always be done in accordance with the wishes of the individual involved and after consultation with their family members (Quill 1995). Furthermore, I believe that euthanasia should take place with the help of trained professionals who understand how to properly administer medications so as to ensure that death occurs quickly and without unnecessary discomfort (McKay et al., 2018). My opinion about euthanasia does not change when applied to animals. As long as the same criteria for human euthanasia are met – i.e., incurable illness causing intense suffering — then I think putting down a pet can also be seen as humane if this alleviates its pain in its last days. Additionally, since animals do not have the same capacity for understanding their situation compared to humans they may benefit more from being put down than they would suffer trying to stay alive while enduring their terminal condition (Bonnett 2019). Ultimately then, I do not feel my opinion on this matters changes between humans and animals; however I recognize why others may feel differently due to factors such as cultural views or emotional attachments. Overall then, my stance on euthanasia remains unchanged regardless if we are discussing humans or pets; however I acknowledge that other people's opinions may differ depending on various influences. Nevertheless all decisions related to this matter must adhere strictly follow professional guidelines and never be taken lightly since once completed cannot easily undone.

tion in the future. This highlights that student motivation is both a cause and a consequence. This assertion that engagement can cause changes motivation is embedded on the idea that students can take actions to meet their own psychological needs and enhance the quality of their motivation. Further, Reeve, J. (2012) asserts that students can be and are architects of their own motivation, at least to the extent that they can be architects of their own course-related behavioral, emotional, cognitive, and agentic engagement.

Synchronous and Asynchronous Learning

The COVID-19 pandemic brought a great disaster on the education system around the world. Schools have struggled due to the situation in which led them to cessation of classes for an extended period of time and other restrictive measures that later on impede the continuance of face-to face classes. In consequence, there is a massive change towards the educational system around the world while educational institutions strive and put their best efforts to resolve the situation. Many schools had addressed the risks and challenges in continuing education amidst the crisis by shifting conventional or traditional learning into distance learning. Distance learning is a form of education through the support of technology that is conducted beyond physical space and time (Papadopulou, 2020). Distance learning is an online education that provides opportunities towards educational advancement and learning development among learners worldwide. In order to sustain the educational goal of our country, distance learning is a new way of providing quality education as much as possible among public and private institutions especially to those pursing in higher education. The instructional delivery in considering distance education can be through synchronous or asynchronous mode of learning, in which students can engage and continually attain quality education despite of the pandemic situation. Based on the definition of Easy LMS Company (2020), synchronous learning refers to a learning event in which a group of participants is engaged in learning at the same time (e.g., zoom meeting, web conference, real- time class) while asynchronous learning refers to the opposite, in which the instructor, the learner, and other participants are not engaged in the learning process at the same time. Thus, there is no real-time interaction with other people (e.g., pre-recorded discussions, self- paced learning, discussion boards). According to article issued by University of Waterloo (2020), synchronous learning is a form of learning that is live presentation which allows the students to ask questions while asynchronous can be a recorded presentation that allows students to have time in reflecting before asking questions. Synchronous learning is a