Presentation software.

at
Categories
Tags

 

prepare a presentation with PowerPoint or other presentation software. You will create your audio or video presentation by using a video capturing tool located in the courseroom. To access the capture tool, follow the tutorial found in your Books and Resources for this Week.

Schedule a time to meet with a couple who can be family, friends, or co-workers. Create a list of questions you might use to evaluate strengths and resources. In addition to thinking about the Microskill Spotlight of circular questioning, think of the three models you have studied in this course. What questions about strengths and resources might each model ask?

Examples of questions include:

What attracted them to each other?
What are their strengths as individuals and a couple?
Who do they turn to for support?
What obstacles have they overcome and how?
Who would also notice they have improved as a couple?
If their relationship was the basis of a movie, what would the title be?
Be creative in thinking of your own questions.

Plan to meet with the couple for 20-30 quiet minutes to discuss strengths and resources based on your list of prepared questions. After meeting with the couple, create a PowerPoint presentation in which you audio or video record your reflection on what the experience was like for you. It is recommended that you prepare notes to help guide your reflection and ensure that you addressing each of the following components:

Briefly describe your overall experience. Were you comfortable or nervous?
What questions did you ask about strengths and resources?
What models did you consider when asking the questions?
Did the questions flow easily or were they challenging?
What was it like to hear them talk about their strengths and resources?
What specific circular question(s) did you ask?
Briefly describe your experience with circular questioning and whether or not you felt it provided any pertinent or additional information.
Imagine yourself several years from now, in an office, meeting with clients. What do you imagine that will be like?

Sample Solution

At last, jus post bellum proposes that the moves we ought to make after a conflict (Frowe (2010), Page 208). Vittola, right off the bat, contends after a conflict, it is the obligation of the pioneer to judge how to manage the foe (Begby et al (2006b), Page 332).. Once more, proportionality is underscored. For instance, the Versailles deal forced after WWI is tentatively excessively cruel, as it was not all Germany’s problem for the conflict. This is upheld by Frowe, who communicates two perspectives in jus post bellum: Moderation and Maximalism, which are very contrasting perspectives. Minimalists recommend a more merciful methodology while maximalist, supporting the above model, gives a crueler methodology, rebuffing the foe both monetarily and strategically (Frowe (2010), Page 208). At the last occurrence, notwithstanding, the point of war is to lay out harmony security, so whatever should be done can be ethically legitimate, assuming it keeps the guidelines of jus promotion bellum. All in all, simply war hypothesis is entirely contestable and can contend in various ways. Be that as it may, the foundation of a fair harmony is essential, making all war type circumstance to have various approaches to drawing nearer (Frowe (2010), Page 227). By the by, the simply war hypothesis contains jus promotion bellum, jus in bello and jus post bellum, and it very well may be either ethically dubious or legitimate contingent upon the proportionality of the situation. Subsequently, there can’t be one conclusive hypothesis of the simply war yet just a hypothetical manual for show how wars ought to be battled, showing normativity in its record, which responds to the inquiry to what a conflict hypothesis is.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.
Hi, how can I help?