Principles of Marketing

 

 

Watch the video which is linked below:

We live in a consumer-driven society. Given the message of this film, how should/can we react as marketers?
• How will the marketing concept be applied? (The marketing concept states that companies should listen to their consumers and develop products to suit their needs)
• Can management of the 4Ps (Product, Price, Place, and Promotion) lead businesses to grow in the coming years?
• How might the housing industry prepare for the effects of oncoming population and demographic changes?

Support your assertions with what you learned about creating customer value.

As far as content is concerned:
• I would organize my pro or con argument with a premise paragraph, then 4 or 5 supporting paragraphs of theories or facts. Finally, a summary paragraph should be written.

use headings for each section, such as:

Premise: An opening paragraph
Supporting Facts:
o Facts or Theory
o Fact or Theory
Fact or Theory
Summary: I have based my pro position (or con) on the above theories and facts.

Your paper should be three pages long, with a cover page.

 

Sample Solution

As marketers, we should be mindful of the message in this film and strive to promote products or services that are ethical and contribute in a positive way to society. We should not market something simply because it is trendy or popular but rather focus on the value of a product or service and how it can benefit consumers. Additionally, marketers need to ensure they are honest about what they are advertising – no inflated claims or purposely misleading information as this could lead to potential legal issues for our organization. Moreover, we must consider the environmental impact of producing goods/services and aim for sustainable business practices where possible. Also, pay attention to current events such as environmental catastrophes; companies have an obligation not only to make efforts towards resolving these problems but also take responsibility when mistakes occur which affect people’s lives adversely due their actions. By being aware of the consequences our decisions may have on consumers, we can become better marketers who prioritize creating positive change through our work instead of just focusing solely on making profits.

Related to the mini-case discussed in class today: Is non-discrimination on the basis of classifications such as those protected under in the EEOC reading a fundamental universal right, regardless of the country/location/culture/religious context of a business or its home country?  Or is such non-discrimination variable as a right, depending on culture, etc.?  What if customers in a particular country or culture have a discriminatory preference-for example, if customers in a particular industry or culture statistically have a greater preference for interaction with someone of a specific gender, race, nationality, etc.?  Should companies be permitted to consider such a customer preference in their hiring and employment practices?  Why or why not?

Under the laws enforced by EEOC, it is illegal to discriminate against someone (applicant or employee) because of that person’s race, color, religion, sex (including gender identity, sexual orientation, and pregnancy), national origin, age (40 or older), disability or genetic information. It is also illegal to retaliate against a person because he or she complained about discrimination, filed a charge of discrimination, or participated in an employment discrimination investigation or lawsuit. I believe that this should be enforced regardless of the country/location/culture/religious context of a business or its home country.

In the case, “Protecting Against Birth Defects”, discussed in class, the company had policies that prohibited women without proof of infertility from working with chemicals associated with birth defects. I disagree with the policy of this company because it discriminates on the basis of gender. Although the risks associated with the children of women working around these chemicals was higher, the offspring’s of men also faced similar risks. It is unfair to have this policy in place only for women. A fair policy would have been demanding proof of infertility irrespective of gender. The company will need to protect itself from future litigations if a child was born with defects. Although the company could have clearly stated the risks involved to all employees regarding birth defects, it does not protect the company against future lawsuits by th

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.