Process improvement principles

 

 

 

Apply process improvement principles to enhance organizational performance and value.

This reflection activity is comprised of two sections, collectively totaling a minimum of 500 words. Complete your reflections by responding to all prompts.

Customer Service Essentials
Consider the following questions based on customer service essentials:
Why are there economies of scale in queuing systems?
What are the pros and cons of pooled-queue systems and separate-queue systems? Provide examples along with your opinion of the best option.
Provide an example of how variability can reduce capacity. Once compromised, how can capacity be restored?

Complex Projects
Consider the most complex project you’ve ever been involved in. Briefly describe the project, giving examples of the following as they pertain to the project.
The work breakdown structure
Tasks
Subtasks
Work package

Were you on the critical path? Additionally, explain the role the project manager played in managing the project’s success or failure. Include an example.

 

 

 

Sample Solution

Process improvement principles

Firms should be able to lower expected average cost by massing reserves, such as repairmen, inventories, checkout clerks and diagnostic equipment. Economists are especially concerned about the potential cost advantage to large-sized operations. The term, scale economies refer to any advantage that a larger-scale operation may have over smaller ones. This advantage may come from a higher level of output per unit of input or a lower production cost per unit of output. There are scale economies inherent to queuing processes. An economy would result in the improvement of a performance characteristic of the service system, such as a reduction in the wait in the queue or in the overall time in the system.

 

 

 

exposition on facebook friendshipThe Internet these days assumes a critical job in individuals’ professions, connections, and different circles of life. Since it began to pick up ubiquity in the mid 1990s, it has transformed into a worldwide system, associating any person who can manage the cost of having a PC to the remainder of the world.

Bit by bit, administrations permitting to make new companions and to keep in contact with previously obtained companions began to show up, and today billions of individuals utilize different interpersonal organizations, of which the biggest is Facebook. These informal organizations despite everything stay a discussed wonder, just as the outcomes they lead to and the manner in which they have changed social orders. Furthermore, maybe, one of the weirdest (at any rate to me) marvels associated with them is Facebook companionship.

A Facebook kinship is adding an individual to your rundown of companions. As I would like to think, this is a sensible activity with individuals whom you care about, or whom you keep up a relationship with. Genuine companions, guardians, your beloved(s), partners with whom you spend time with after work, individuals whom you have warmed up to while voyaging, etc, should be available in any Facebook companion list.

Be that as it may, in reality, individuals include new individuals whom they have never met or known. Regardless of whether they have never traded words, they despite everything keep each other in their companion records. Or on the other hand another model is when associates who work in a similar office include one another, yet don’t speak with one another in Facebook or even in the workplace. Or on the other hand when irregular individuals who have (under certain conditions) conveyed for a few minutes, at that point add each other to their companion records. At times individuals even add different clients to their companion records for a demonstration of amount—maybe, it is intended to show how friendly they are. These, just as numerous other comparable cases, I don’t comprehend, and this is one reason why I have stopped utilizing informal organizations about a year back.

Companion records can be a wellspring of different aggravations. For instance, individuals some of the time are reluctant to erase such arbitrary “companions” from their rundowns, due to expecting an issues associated with this demonstration—managing someone’s feelings, for instance, or clarifying their reasons. Or maybe regularly, erasing individuals from Facebook companions should show the pace of dissatisfaction or outrage caused to a client by the erased individuals. Simultaneously, genuine correspondence frequently proceeds as though nothing spe

 

 

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.