Professional & Ethical Behavior

 

You are the assistant principal of ESE Middle School at the heart of ESEville. You have been an assistant
principal at the school for 5 years, with much success. You are ready to become a principal.You’ve been
hearing rumors for a number of years that the Crisis Intervention Teacher has had inappropriate behavior with
teachers, students and staff. On a few occasions, a number of teachers have come to you about sexually
suggestive comments made to teachers, and you have reported them to the principal. She has never acted on
these concerns. Other complaints have been brought to your desk about his manhandling/ abuse of students.
You’ve gathered statements and approached the principal. Yet, she does nothing. You don’t understand her
reluctance to remove this individual from student contact. This year, a technology position opens at the school.
You know he (CIT)is perfect for the job and it would limit his access to students and staff. You suggest to the
principal this is a way to address a potentially embarrassing situation. She presses you why you continue with
your accusations, and you explain that she’s lost a number of outstanding staff to other schools because she
refuses to move him (thus eliminating his abusive behavior).What will you do? How would you handle this
situation? How could you handle this situation? What strategies might you use to influence the Principal into
making the decision you know is best for the students?

 

Sample Solution

to research what role gender plays in these dyadic relationships. Furthermore, it is investigated whether gender moderates the relationship between organizational citizenship behaviour (OCB) and LMX. Literature on the topic is examined and reviewed. The results of the studies discussed are extremely inconsistent, and it is yet unclear what the role of gender is in LMX relationships. However, it is clear that gender does not act as a moderator between OCB and LMX. Limitations, implications, and suggestions for future research are discussed.

Over the past two decades, research into leadership has grown rapidly. A well-known and extensively researched leadership theory is leader-member exchange theory, also abbreviated as LMX. Whereas a lot of theories focus on the role of the leader specifically, LMX theory focuses on the relationship between leader and follower. It states that leaders develop unique relationships with their followers, and that these relationships affect various factors such as job performance and satisfaction. Furthermore, LMX relationships seem to range from low to high. A situation in which a subordinate and a leader simply comply to their obligations, would be considered a low-quality LMX relationship. A high-quality LMX relationship goes beyond these obligations, and contains elements of mutual trust and respect (Avolio, Walumbwa, & Weber, 2009; Breevaart et al., 2013). Going above and beyond obligations of a job is known as organizational citizenship behaviour (OCB). Currall and Organ (1988) conceptualize the term as voluntarily helping others without necessarily expecting more than their pay check. These workers feel a certain commitment to the organization that goes beyond what is minimally expected from them and what is stated in their contract. Not surprisingly, OCB is considered to benefit the organization and contribute to organizational effectiveness (Organ, Podsakoff, & MacKenzie, 2006). Considering that the conceptualizations of high-quality LMX relationships and OCB both include employees “giving their all”, a link between these two seems plausible.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.