Project Management

 

> Compare and contrast a product breakdown structure (PBS) and a work breakdown structure (WBS).

> What is a scope baseline, what are its components, and why is it important?

> Describe the differences and similarities between the cone of uncertainty and rolling wave planning.

> Give an example of each class of constraint on determining the activity sequence.

Sample Solution

Product Breakdown Structure (PBS) vs. Work Breakdown Structure (WBS)

Focus:

  • PBS: Tangible outputs of the project (products, deliverables)
  • WBS: Work required to produce those outputs (tasks, activities)

Structure:

  • PBS: Hierarchical decomposition of products into components
  • WBS: Hierarchical decomposition of work into smaller tasks

Key Differences:

  • PBS: Helps define the scope of the project in terms of deliverables.
  • WBS: Guides project planning and execution.

Relationship:

  • PBS often informs the development of the WBS, ensuring the work aligns with the desired outputs.

Image:

Scope Baseline

Definition:

  • A set of documents that define the project’s scope and serve as a reference point for managing scope changes.

Components:

  • Scope Statement: A detailed description of the project’s scope.
  • WBS: A hierarchical decomposition of the work required to deliver the project scope.
  • WBS Dictionary: Detailed descriptions of each WBS element.

Importance:

  • Establishes a clear understanding of the project’s scope among stakeholders.
  • Provides a basis for measuring progress and managing scope change.
  • Helps prevent scope creep, which can lead to project delays and cost overruns.

Cone of Uncertainty vs. Rolling Wave Planning

Cone of Uncertainty:

  • A concept illustrating the decreasing level of uncertainty in project estimates as the project progresses.
  • Early in the project, estimates have a wide range of potential outcomes.
  • As the project progresses, more information becomes available, and estimates become more accurate.

Rolling Wave Planning:

  • An iterative planning approach that focuses on near-term work while allowing for flexibility in the future.
  • Detailed planning is done for the immediate work, while high-level planning is done for future work.
  • Plans are updated regularly as new information becomes available.

Similarities:

  • Both acknowledge the uncertainty inherent in project planning.
  • Both emphasize the need for adaptability and flexibility in planning.

Differences:

  • Cone of Uncertainty focuses on the concept of uncertainty itself.
  • Rolling Wave Planning is a specific planning technique that addresses uncertainty.

Image:

Constraints on Activity Sequencing

Types of Constraints:

  • Mandatory Dependencies: Hard constraints that must be followed (e.g., foundation must be laid before building walls).
  • Discretionary Dependencies: Preferred sequences based on best practices or experience (e.g., testing after coding).
  • External Dependencies: Constraints imposed by external factors (e.g., waiting for a government permit).
  • Resource Constraints: Limitations on resources like staff, equipment, or budget.

Examples:

  • Mandatory Dependency: Painting a room cannot start until the walls are dry.
  • Discretionary Dependency: Hiring a project manager is often done early in the project.
  • External Dependency: Obtaining a permit from the city is required before starting construction.
  • Resource Constraint: A limited number of developers may restrict the number of tasks that can be worked on simultaneously.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer