Project Management

 

> Compare and contrast a product breakdown structure (PBS) and a work breakdown structure (WBS).

> What is a scope baseline, what are its components, and why is it important?

> Describe the differences and similarities between the cone of uncertainty and rolling wave planning.

> Give an example of each class of constraint on determining the activity sequence.

Sample Solution

Product Breakdown Structure (PBS) vs. Work Breakdown Structure (WBS)

Focus:

  • PBS: Tangible outputs of the project (products, deliverables)
  • WBS: Work required to produce those outputs (tasks, activities)

Structure:

  • PBS: Hierarchical decomposition of products into components
  • WBS: Hierarchical decomposition of work into smaller tasks

Key Differences:

  • PBS: Helps define the scope of the project in terms of deliverables.
  • WBS: Guides project planning and execution.

Relationship:

  • PBS often informs the development of the WBS, ensuring the work aligns with the desired outputs.

Image:

Scope Baseline

Definition:

  • A set of documents that define the project’s scope and serve as a reference point for managing scope changes.

Components:

  • Scope Statement: A detailed description of the project’s scope.
  • WBS: A hierarchical decomposition of the work required to deliver the project scope.
  • WBS Dictionary: Detailed descriptions of each WBS element.

Importance:

  • Establishes a clear understanding of the project’s scope among stakeholders.
  • Provides a basis for measuring progress and managing scope change.
  • Helps prevent scope creep, which can lead to project delays and cost overruns.

Cone of Uncertainty vs. Rolling Wave Planning

Cone of Uncertainty:

  • A concept illustrating the decreasing level of uncertainty in project estimates as the project progresses.
  • Early in the project, estimates have a wide range of potential outcomes.
  • As the project progresses, more information becomes available, and estimates become more accurate.

Rolling Wave Planning:

  • An iterative planning approach that focuses on near-term work while allowing for flexibility in the future.
  • Detailed planning is done for the immediate work, while high-level planning is done for future work.
  • Plans are updated regularly as new information becomes available.

Similarities:

  • Both acknowledge the uncertainty inherent in project planning.
  • Both emphasize the need for adaptability and flexibility in planning.

Differences:

  • Cone of Uncertainty focuses on the concept of uncertainty itself.
  • Rolling Wave Planning is a specific planning technique that addresses uncertainty.

Image:

Constraints on Activity Sequencing

Types of Constraints:

  • Mandatory Dependencies: Hard constraints that must be followed (e.g., foundation must be laid before building walls).
  • Discretionary Dependencies: Preferred sequences based on best practices or experience (e.g., testing after coding).
  • External Dependencies: Constraints imposed by external factors (e.g., waiting for a government permit).
  • Resource Constraints: Limitations on resources like staff, equipment, or budget.

Examples:

  • Mandatory Dependency: Painting a room cannot start until the walls are dry.
  • Discretionary Dependency: Hiring a project manager is often done early in the project.
  • External Dependency: Obtaining a permit from the city is required before starting construction.
  • Resource Constraint: A limited number of developers may restrict the number of tasks that can be worked on simultaneously.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.