Governmental Operations: Ensure that you focus specifically on the organizational, legal, or cultural challenge that you selected. 1. Civil Service Implementation: Assess the impact that the implementation of civil service had on the effectiveness of public service in the federal government. 2. Local Governmental Operations: Illustrate how public administration has manifested itself in local governmental operations. In other words, what impact has professional management had on local governmental operations? For example, you could consider how prevalent the mayor/manager form of government is. 3. Impact of Iron Triangle: Assess the impact of the “iron triangle” on public policy and program administration at the state and federal levels of government. In other words, how does the bureaucracy counterbalance the direct relationship between special interests and the legislature? B. Differences Between Public Administration and Private Sector Management: Ensure that you focus specifically on the organizational, legal, or cultural challenge that you selected. 1. Organizational Differences: Contrast the impact of political boundaries in governmental operations versus the private sector. For example, you could consider how political boundaries impact program and operational efficiencies. Provide specific examples to support your response. 2. Legal Differences: Analyze mandates, legal and nonlegal, related to the challenge you selected. How do they impact the operations of state and local governments? How do these mandates apply to private sector firms? Provide specific examples to support your response. 3. Cultural Differences: Illustrate the impacts politics can have on administrative appointments in the public and private sectors. In other words, what is the impact of political appointments on the culture of governmental agencies and private businesses? Provide specific examples to support your response. C. Roles of the Executive, Legislative, and Judicial Branches: Ensure that you focus specifically on the organizational, legal, or cultural challenge that you selected. 1. Executive Branch: Outline the role of the executive branch of government in the development of public policy, specifically related to the challenge you selected. 2. Legislative Branch: Outline the role of the legislative branch of government in the development of public policy, specifically related to the challenge you selected. 3. Judicial Branch: What role does the court system play in arbitrating public policy disputes between the executive and legislative branches of government? Focus specifically on how the judicial branch has impacted the challenge you selected. D. Public Budgeting Techniques: Ensure that you focus specifically on the organizational, legal, or cultural challenge that you selected. 1. Zero-Based Budgeting: Assess the principle of zero-based budgeting for how it has impacted federal programs and their stakeholders. What are the pros and cons of this methodology? 2. Performance-Based Budgeting: Assess how performance-based budgeting applies to private sector budgeting practices in a public sector setting. What are the pros and cons of this methodology? Include the impact on public programs and their stakeholders in your response. 3. Emerging Budget Strategies: Describe emerging budget strategies being utilized by public agencies to address the difficult fiscal environment facing local governments. In other words, what contemporary public budgeting techniques are effective? E. Governmental Communication Strategies: Ensure that you focus specifically on the organizational, legal, or cultural challenge that you selected. 1. Impact of Social Media: Assess the effectiveness of social media on governmental operations at the federal, state, or local governmental level. Consider questions such as these: What impact has social media had in enhancing public outreach? How has social media been used to develop a sense of community? 2. Impact of Other Media Types: Assess how various other media types can enhance public outreach and impact a citizen’s sense of community. 3. Communication Strategies: How has the proliferation of information outlets impacted the communication strategies utilized by government officials?
moderate individual faces challenges”. (p.39)
One of the qualities of a compelling understudy is to face challenges. Understudies take gambles each time they pose inquiry, or answer to the Instructor. Experts like Ely (1984) and Samimy (1991) pondered Chance taking and considered Hazard Taking as one of the characteristics of good understudies. Lover (1985) states that dynamic support of the understudies in game plan of significance through data gives understudies huge result. Significant information is fundamental in outlining semantic expertise and critical result is essential in forming syntactic ability. Accordingly, Understudy quietness in homeroom is the issue of EFL Educators.
Anyway, researchers don’t all agree that shortfall of Chance Taking limit isn’t solely outer. Examiners included not simply non-Understudy related parts or outside components yet also Understudy related or internal factors.
Understudy related factors involve individual and loaded with feeling factors related to understudies Hazard Taking execution. They integrate age, orientation, personality, inspiration, certainty and nervousness. Understudies’ Gamble taking behavior is impacted by external variables, for instance, their social convictions or practices, their learning situation, for instance,
Educators’ mentality, showing style and other course related parts like class size and study hall works out. Ely (1989), in a study hall discernment and sound narrative the individuals attempting to find the association between Chance Taking and oral help, contemplated that there was a basic association between homeroom cooperation and oral capacity.
Risk Taking components can be arranged as Understudy related factors those that impact understudies from inside and non-Understudy related components those that impact understudies from outside and exist in Language learning condition. Understudy related factors or inside parts are those that the singular Language understudy conveys with him/her to the particular learning conditions include: motivation, certainty, nervousness, and character quality. Outside components are those that depict the particular Language-learning situation. Non Understudy related components influencing risk taking behavior of the Language understudies integrate their learning situation, for instance, Instructor’s mentality and showing styles and course related components like class size and study hall activity.
Local area Language learning or educating getting the hang concerning as shown by Curran (1976), proposes a pleasing and warm air where understudies are encouraged to rehearse exercises to convey in the homeroom and understudies successfully face challenges without feeling compromised. Seliger (1977) in an