You are a reporter for your local media outlet and have scheduled an interview with your local congressperson, who sits on the Committee on Ways and Means for the U.S. House of Representatives. The focus of the interview is to get the congressperson’s response to the public’s perception that the party is simply obstructing the president’s agenda rather than representing the public’s interest and upholding the democratic process. For your paper, develop three questions you would ask, and explain your rationale for asking these questions. Defend your explanation with scholarly resources.
Your paper should include the following elements:
• An explanation of how each question will lead to your intended goal.
• A defense of your strategy with scholarly research
The public perception of Congress as an obstructionist body has become increasingly prevalent. This paper outlines three key questions to pose to a local congressperson on the Ways and Means Committee to delve deeper into this issue. Each question is designed to elicit a response that addresses the core of the public’s concern while also providing opportunities for the congressperson to articulate their perspective.
Rationale: This question directly challenges the notion that party affiliation trumps constituent needs. By framing the question in terms of balancing act, it allows the congressperson to acknowledge the complexities of their role without forcing a defensive response. It also provides an opening for the congressperson to discuss specific instances where they have prioritized constituent needs over party loyalty.
Scholarly Support: According to research by Jacobs and Shapiro (2000), the increasing polarization of the American political landscape has led to a decline in trust in government. By asking this question, the reporter can assess the congressperson’s awareness of this trend and their commitment to representing the interests of their constituents.
Rationale: This question forces the congressperson to move beyond rhetoric and provide concrete examples of their work. By focusing on constituent benefits, it shifts the conversation away from partisan gridlock and towards the tangible impact of their policies. It also allows the public to evaluate the congressperson’s claims of representing their interests.
Scholarly Support: As noted by Iyengar and Westwood (2001), voters often rely on cues and information shortcuts to form opinions about politicians. By asking for specific examples, the reporter can help voters make more informed judgments about the congressperson’s effectiveness.
Rationale: This question addresses the broader issue of governance and the role of Congress in finding solutions to complex problems. By focusing on specific challenges, it encourages the congressperson to discuss their approach to policymaking and their willingness to work across the aisle. It also provides an opportunity to assess their understanding of the public’s desire for cooperation and problem-solving.
Scholarly Support: Research by Fiorina and Abrams (2008) highlights the importance of divided government in promoting compromise and moderation. This question allows the congressperson to articulate their views on this topic and to explain how they balance their party’s agenda with the need for bipartisan solutions.
In conclusion, these three questions are designed to elicit a nuanced and informative response from the congressperson while addressing the core concerns of the public. By focusing on constituent needs, specific policy outcomes, and the role of compromise, the interview can contribute to a more informed electorate and a more accountable government.