Quadratic Formulas

Watch a video on Working with Quadratic Formulas and do the following:
1. Describe one example of a teacher applying Bloom’s Taxonomy.
2. Explain why the example in C1 is an application of Bloom’s Taxonomy.

Sample Solution

Bloom’s Taxonomy is an educational framework for categorizing learning objectives based on complexity and depth of knowledge (Higgins et al., 2018). In the video “Working with Quadratic Formulas,” one example of a teacher employing Bloom’s Taxonomy can be seen when they ask students to solve for x in the equation x2 + 8x = 18. This question requires students to go beyond merely recalling facts about quadratic equations such as how the terms are defined or what their purpose is and instead engage in more complex processes like applying this information to solve a real-world problem (Krathwohl et al., 2000).

The instructor has broken down the task into several parts, first beginning with simpler activities such as fact recall before progressing to deeper levels of thought like analysis which require higher order thinking skills from their pupils (Krathwohl et al., 2000) . They have also provided support along the way by providing hints and guiding questions which help students work through each step of solving the equation.

Overall , this demonstrates how Bloom’s taxonomy can be applied within a classroom setting. By forcing students to work through various levels of thought it promotes deeper understanding and encourages creative problem solving while also allowing teachers to observe their students’ understanding at different levels rather than simply relying on memorization.

regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating to take note of that while there is a limited ability to recall lumps of data, how much pieces in every one of those lumps can change broadly (Miller, 1956). Anyway it’s anything but a straightforward instance of having the memorable option huge pieces right away, somewhat that as each piece turns out to be more natural, it very well may be acclimatized into a lump, which is then recollected itself. Recoding is the interaction by which individual pieces are ‘recoded’ and allocated to lumps. Consequently the ends that can be drawn from Miller’s unique work is that, while there is an acknowledged breaking point to the quantity of pi

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.