Sample Solution
Medication errors are a major patient safety concern and have been the subject of much research. The causes of medication errors can be complex, but generally arise from the complex nature of health care delivery and medication administration. According to Zhang et al. (2020), common causes of medication errors include improper prescribing, wrong dose or route selection, inappropriate duration or frequency, inadequate monitoring, lack of communication between healthcare professionals, inadequate documentation/documentation errors, lack of patient knowledge or understanding about their medications and incomplete risk assessment.
In order to reduce the incidence rate of medication errors in health care settings quality improvement interventions should be utilised. Quality improvement initiatives that target specific areas such as improved communication between healthcare teams have been shown to significantly reduce rates of medical error (Kleinpell & Farley-Barnhill 2020). Other interventions that may help reduce medication error rates could include enhanced training for healthcare staff on safe prescribing practices; increased use of clinical decision support systems; automated dispensing cabinets with barcode scanning technology; improved documentation processes; and an emphasis on patient education and involvement in their own care (Zhang et al., 2020).
Overall, there is strong evidence supporting quality improvement interventions as an effective means for reducing medication error rates in health care settings. However, further research is needed to determine which combinations of these strategies would be most successful at achieving optimal outcomes while ensuring cost-effectiveness.
The utilization of sentimentality assists a brand with empowering the client to experience passionate feelings for, as Picard states “All that we do is intended to make individuals go gaga for our image. Every one of the decorations of our industry – the shows, the promoting the VIPs, the media inclusion” (M.Tungate 2014). Wistfulness has related itself in design with ‘In vogue 20-year-olds stroll around seeming as though they jumped out of a vast wormhole from the 1963 or 1944 or 1922, or even 1890’. (Matchar p. 2 2015) The current highstreets is taking motivation from all periods, making a half and half time from “A-line dresses, specked swiss covers, grassland skirts”.(Matchar 2015) With A-line dresses, dabbed swiss covers and grassland skirts all creating nostalgic recollections of the homegrown housewife.
A reason for sentimentalities developing fame is the dematerialization in items in the public eye. .’This work to make up for dematerialization likewise happens on different degrees of society: in day to day existence, we frequently see the arrival of past qualities epitomized objects, for instance in the dress of those style peculiarities known as ‘trendy people’ (Neiyemer 2014 pg44) Youthful teenagers and grown-ups like to wear one of a kind dress with a significance and story to them. With an interest into their parent’s past, giving a “worth of coolness its music, its garments and its frill”. Through this one of a kind peculiarity brands are embracing this tasteful for the dress and giving another life to past patterns and pieces of clothing. Huge brands, for example, Nike and Pepsi are reusing one of a kind plans and logos from earlier years, “reporting them as legacy or retro” things. Alongside style, shows and motion pictures are additionally applying “old plan highlights and procedures to stimulate the nostalgic nerves of their watchers.” (Harvey 2017). From style to film, sentimentality is being utilized as a key offering point to draw in clients and make a profound association with their crowd. Brands know how significant wistfulness and a ‘story’ are to clients, to such an extent brands make a set of experiences for themselves. Through making a set of experiences to the brand, the client acquires a feeling of solace, as commonality and dependability is produced. As Van Dyck states ‘according to the shopper, the historical backdrop of a brand – regardless of whether it has vanished from the scene for a period (like the Smaller than normal Cooper) or regardless of whether the set of experiences is ‘phony’ (like Hollister) – addresses a sort of dependability. These nostalgic brands summon different affiliations and every affiliation has its own personal association. Along these lines, there is potential for the more effectiv
