Quality of Care in Health Care

please respond to the following:

Assess the degree and quality of care established in 18th-century U.S. hospitals, as compared to the level of care seen in 21st-century hospitals.
Compare and contrast the U.S. health care delivery system relative to spending per capita and ranking of health care outcomes with the health care systems of two other countries.
Determine whether the U.S. health care delivery spending per capita is detrimental to the quality of care provided in the 21st-century hospitals. Provide specific examples to support your rationale from readings throughout your program or from peer-reviewed journal articles.
Be sure to respond to at least one of your classmates’ posts.

Sample Solution

18th-Century U.S. Hospitals:

  • Limited medical knowledge: Medical understanding was rudimentary, and treatments often involved unproven or harmful practices.
  • Poor sanitation: Hospitals were often unsanitary, leading to high rates of infection and mortality.
  • Limited resources: Hospitals lacked adequate equipment, supplies, and trained staff.

21st-Century U.S. Hospitals:

  • Advanced medical technology: Hospitals have access to sophisticated equipment and diagnostic tools.
  • Evidence-based practices: Care is guided by scientific evidence and best practices.
  • Specialized care: Hospitals offer specialized care for various conditions and patient populations.
  • Improved sanitation: Modern sanitation and infection control practices have significantly reduced the risk of hospital-acquired infections.

Comparison with Other Countries

The U.S. health care system is often compared to those of other developed countries due to its high spending per capita. While the U.S. spends more on healthcare than many other countries, its health outcomes are often ranked lower.

Example:

  • Switzerland: Despite spending less per capita than the U.S., Switzerland consistently ranks high in international health rankings. This is attributed to factors such as universal health coverage, strong primary care, and a focus on prevention.
  • Canada: Canada also spends less per capita than the U.S. and has universal health coverage. While its health outcomes are generally good, there are concerns about wait times for certain procedures and access to specialized care.

Spending Per Capita and Quality of Care

While high spending per capita does not guarantee high-quality care, it can provide the resources necessary to improve outcomes. However, the U.S. health care system faces several challenges that may hinder the effectiveness of spending:

  • Administrative costs: A significant portion of healthcare spending is allocated to administrative costs, such as insurance premiums, billing, and paperwork.
  • Drug prices: The U.S. often pays significantly higher prices for prescription drugs compared to other countries.
  • Inequality: Access to quality care is often influenced by socioeconomic factors, leading to disparities in health outcomes.

Specific examples:

  • Medication costs: The high cost of prescription drugs in the U.S. can limit access to essential medications for many patients.
  • Administrative burden: The complex and burdensome administrative processes in the U.S. health care system can divert resources away from patient care.

In conclusion, while 21st-century U.S. hospitals have made significant advancements in care quality, the high spending per capita does not always translate into optimal outcomes. Addressing issues such as administrative costs, drug prices, and inequality is essential for improving the efficiency and effectiveness of the U.S. health care system.

 

This question has been answered.

Get Answer