write 1-2 paragraphs reflecting on your learning for the week. Guiding questions are provided or you may write about what you felt was most significant to you for the week.
How hard was it to find a quantitative article related to your area of interest?
Did you have any difficulty determining whether the articles you reviewed were quantitative?
Is the quantitative approach appropriate for your area of interest? Would you be able to replicate the study you found?
This week, I have learned a lot about the importance of finding quantitative research articles when conducting research. It was a bit challenging to find an article related to my area of interest as there are not many available and most of them require payment or access to certain databases. However, with some patience and perseverance, I was eventually able to locate one that was suitable for my needs.
When determining whether an article is quantitative or qualitative, it can be difficult at times as you need to look at the methods used in order to determine which type of data it is using. When looking at the article I chose, it became apparent that they had used a structured survey question format along with statistical analysis tools such as regression models and chi-square tests which indicated its use of quantitative data (Lam et al., 2020). Additionally, throughout the paper they referred back to these results so as to draw conclusions which further confirmed its status as being quantitative research.
In conclusion, this week’s learning experience has been invaluable in helping me understand why using quantitative research articles is important when conducting studies. Through practice I have developed both the skills and confidence needed in searching for appropriate material while also being aware of how best distinguish between qualitative and quantitative approaches (Giles & Eyles., 2016).
Capitalism results in economic growth because it feeds innovation through competition. China has developed an increasingly free market economy. The Soviet Union was innovative whenever they were involved in competing with the United States, but for products only distributed within their nation, it was always the bare minimum. The “invisible hand” of competition, brings the market to a natural equilibrium according to Adam Smith. Competition supports individual growth as well, and eventually results in more specializations of work.
An important distinction between capitalism and communism is the idea of equal opportunity verses equal outcome. Capitalism supports the idea of equal opportunity, but this automatically results in an unequal outcome because of the varying amounts in which different people are willing to work. Communism on the other hand supports the idea of equal outcome. There should be no wealth gaps in a communist state because it doesn’t matter how much work a person puts into succeeding, they end up with the same result. There is no competition, and there is no opportunity for growth.
China was primarily communist before for the majority of the 20th century, but they began transitioning into a mixed economy during the 90’s. They’ve experienced great economic growth due to this transition. In 1990, China’s GDP was 360.585 billion USD, and in 2011 12.238 trillion USD (China, 2017). The gross nominal income, GNI, per capita has also grown from 330 USD in 1990, to 8, 690 USD in 2017 (China, 2017). The new plan for China is to focus on innovation and becoming a leader in technological advances. “Made in China 2025” is a plan set out by Xi Jinping to change the Chinese economy to a mixed economy instead of a controlled economy (Amadeo, 2018). They are recognizing the relationship that innovation and competition have in furthering the economy. China’s plans to evolve into a mixed economy with more privatized markets will turn China into a more economically balanced nation.