Quantitative research

at
Categories
Tags

Critically evaluate a quantitative research study on a social
science topic. Your instructor will post an announcement with the reference for the article assigned for the
exam. The study will be from a peer-reviewed journal and published within the last 10 years.
In the body of your critique, describe the statistical approaches used, the variables included, the hypothesis(es)
proposed, and the interpretation of the results. In your conclusion, suggest other statistical approaches that
could have been used and, if appropriate, suggest alternative interpretations of the results. This process will
allow you to apply the concepts learned throughout the course in the interpretation of actual scientific research.
Your critique must include the following sections and information:
Introduction:
Identify clearly the research questions and/or hypothesis(es) as well as the purpose of the study.
Methods:
Describe the procedures and methods of data collection, measures/instruments used, the participants and how
they were selected, and the statistical techniques used.
Results:
Summarize in this section the results presented in the study.
Discussion:
Evaluate the efficacy of the research study by discussing the following:
Address the strengths, weaknesses, and limitations of the study and suggest future research directions.
Include additional forms of statistical analyses as part of the suggestions for future research.
Conclusion:
Summarize the main points of your evaluation of the study.
Explain how the statistical test used in the study could be applied to your future career. Give one example.
Discuss how your ability to critique quantitative research could impact your future career.
The Final Exam Part 2 paper
Must be three to four double-spaced pages in length (not including title and references pages) and formatted
according to APA Style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center’s APA Style (Links to an external site.)
Must include a separate title page with the following:
Title of paper
Student’s name
Course name and number
Instructor’s name
Date submitted
For further assistance with the formatting and the title page, refer to APA Formatting for Word 2013 (Links to an
external site.).
Must utilize academic voice. See the Academic Voice (Links to an external site.) resource for additional
guidance.
Must include an introduction and a conclusion paragraph that summarizes your critical evaluation.
For assistance on writing Introductions & Conclusions (Links to an external site.), refer to the Ashford Writing
Center resources.
Must use the quantitative research study assigned by your instructor. It is strongly recommended that you also
use either the textbook or a peer-reviewed article about the statistical test(s) used by the researchers, to
support your evaluation of the study.
You may find the Writing Center resource Action Words in Academic Writing (Links to an external site.) helpful
in understanding the requirements of the assignment.
The Scholarly, Peer-Reviewed, and Other Credible Sources (Links to an external site.) table offers additional
guidance on appropriate source types. If you have questions about whether a specific source is appropriate for
this assignment, please contact your instructor. Your instructor has the final say about the appropriateness of a
specific source for a particular assignment.
To assist you in completing the research required for this assignment, view this Ashford University Library
Quick ‘n’ Dirty (Links to an external site.) tutorial, which introduces the Ashford University Library and the
research process, and provides some library search tips.
3/27/2020 Order 314524107
https://admin.writerbay.com/orders_available?subcom=detailed&id=314524107 3/4
Must document any information used from sources in APA Style as outlined in the Ashford Writing Center’s
APA: Citing Within Your Paper (Links to an external site.)
Must include a separate references page that is formatted according to APA Style as outlined in the Ashford
Writing Center. See the APA: Formatting Your References List (Links to an external site.) resource in the
Ashford Writing Center for specifications.
Carefully review the Grading Rubric (Links to an external site.) fo

Sample Solution

here is no proof on how the Bible was composed, the main information we have on it originates from it itself. It was revamped commonly all through hundreds of years simply dependent on what was composed before at that point. There is a three-advance procedure that you should follow to check whether something is really history. The initial step is to acquire the entirety of the data you can on the particular occasion, second each and every snippet of data must be analyzed to be viewed as a reality, and in conclusion a scholarly history specialist utilizes the entirety of the data that has been demonstrated to reproduce the occasion for others to gain from. When taking a gander at the Bible regarding history you need to test it a similar way you would with other history despite the fact that religions take a gander at it as a holy book.

When utilizing the Hebrew Bible as authentic information two inquiries must be answers, how were the books created and who kept in touch with them? what’s more, the subsequent inquiry is how could we come to have these books? The Hebrew Bible was passed down for quite a long time, all through it being passed down numerous individuals would chip away at them and compose new things. Its greater part is written in Hebrew while there is a modest quantity written in Aramaic. Probably the most seasoned interpretation is called Septuagint it was written in the fourth century CE. Toward the starting the Bible was a lot of parchments. When the Christian Church incorporated the Jewish Bible as their very own component they split it up into the Old Testament and the New Testament and they began utilizing the codex to introduce the Testaments. Tanakh is an abbreviation for the three segments of the Hebrew Bible, the Torah, Neviim, and Ketuvim. The Torah is viewed as God’s disclosures to Moses. Neviim is meant Prophets which portray encounters from the individuals of Israel. Ketuvim is meant works however it is increasingly delineated as random as it incorporates tunes supplications, sonnets and hymns. There is no proof of canonization there are just compositions that recount times where works were perceived as sanctioned.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer