1. Delta has extended the lives of flight equipment four times since 1986. Why would they do this?
2. Complete the Excel table provided as part of the assignment. When you compare the depreciation results from the planes purchased in the early 1980’s to the planes purchased in the 2000’s, what do you notice?
3. If there had been no adoption of “Fresh Start Accounting”, what would the Net Book Value be for aircraft D4061 and D4072 at the end of 2007? You may add a column to the provided Excel worksheet to calculate the result if you like.
4. When Delta elected “Fresh Start Accounting” for 2007, how did Delta establish the fair value of these assets?
5. In your opinion, should the adoption of “fresh start accounting” be open to any corporation where management feels traditional historical cost-based accounting no longer allows them to present a fair picture of the assets, liabilities, stockholders’ equity and operating performance of that company?
Delta Airlines and Extending Aircraft Life: A Financial Analysis
Here’s a breakdown of the questions regarding Delta Airlines and their practices:
There can be several reasons why Delta might extend the lives of their aircraft:
By comparing the depreciation results for aircraft purchased in the early 1980s to those purchased in the 2000s in the provided Excel table, you might notice:
To calculate the Net Book Value (NBV) for aircraft D4061 and D4072 at the end of 2007 without “Fresh Start Accounting,” you can add a new column to the Excel table. This column would calculate the NBV by subtracting the accumulated depreciation from the original purchase cost for each year. The ending balance of this column for 2007 would represent the NBV without “Fresh Start Accounting.”
When Delta adopted “Fresh Start Accounting” for 2007, they likely used various methods to establish the fair value of their assets, including:
“Fresh Start Accounting” is a controversial practice. Here’s a breakdown of the arguments for and against allowing it:
Arguments for Allowing “Fresh Start Accounting”:
Arguments Against Allowing “Fresh Start Accounting”:
Overall Opinion:
“Fresh Start Accounting” should be used with caution and under strict regulations. Independent audits and clear disclosures are crucial to ensure transparency and prevent manipulation of financial statements.
It’s generally recommended that companies use traditional historical cost-based accounting whenever possible. However, there might be exceptional circumstances where “Fresh Start Accounting” could be considered with proper justification and regulatory oversight.