Sample Solution
In Kate Chopin’s “The Story of an Hour”, there are elements of realism and modernism. The story centers around the protagonist Mrs. Mallard who is informed that her husband has been killed in a train accident which causes her to experience a range of emotions from grief to joy to understanding. This narrative allows readers to witness how individuals cope with tragedy and ultimately become liberated upon overcoming it (Chopin 1894).
Realism is evident within the text as it focuses on depicting common everyday events such as marriage or death in order to convey true-to-life experiences (Dearden 2017). For example, when Mrs. Mallard initially hears the news about her husband she becomes overwhelmed by grief and faints; an event which most likely happens in real life despite its lack of drama or excitement when compared with other genres such as romance. In addition, this work also touches upon gender roles and marital expectations during 19th century –as seen when Dr. Brentley says that: “she had loved him—sometimes”(Chopin 1894)– further reflecting realties faced by women during those times.
Modernism is also apparent within this piece as it incorporates fragmented perspectives, multiple truths ,and ambiguous endings . Through using third person limited point view , Chopin conveys how each character perceives certain situations differently leading readers draw their own conclusions regarding what truly happened . Additionally , New Critic approaches might be used analyze how various themes such as freedom or self identity are explored throughout the story leaving readers somewhat confused yet still able find meaning behind these concepts –a hallmark characteristic many modern works showcase
In conclusion ,Kate Chopins \”The Story Of An Hour\” can be considered both Realist and Modernist due its focus on portraying realistic events while simultaneously incorporating ambiguous ending along with multiple truths allowing for different interpretations . By using these approaches together , Chopins allows us gain insight into marriage dynamics between two people navigating through societal expectations while still finding individual identities amongst chaos.
stating, “I don’t want to be a writer. It’s stupid. It’s a stupid waste of time.” Chris responds, “That’s your dad talking.” Chris notes that Gordie is repressing his American dream because his father does not want him to be a writer. He then states that he wishes he was Gordie’s father because if he were, Gordie would not be considering taking shop courses instead of his college courses. Chris acts as a father figure to Gordie, who finds comfort and solace in his friends following his brother’s death. He resents the idea of taking college courses because he knows that it will isolate him from his friends, leaving him completely alone. When the boys finally make camp for the night and go to bed, Gordie is awoken by a nightmare of his father telling him “it should’ve been you” referring to Denny’s death.
Chris’ American dream is to prove wrong the people that believe he will ultimately end up bad because of his family. When Gordie mentions that Chris could take college courses too, he states that no one would let him because they all think of him as “one of those lowlife Chamber kids.” He then explains how upset he was at being suspended from school. Chris was suspended because he stole the school’s milk money, not because he wanted to, but because he was expected to. When he became guilty and tried returning the money, his teacher used it to buy herself a new suit. He explains to Gordie that even if he tried to tell someone that story, they wouldn’t believe him because he’s nothing more than a kid brother to Eyeball Chambers. Deep down, Chris is a good kid whose dream is to succeed in life. His American dream is to make the adults in his life see him not as a punk, but as the intelligent, caring, boy that he is.
One of the most important scenes in the film occurs when the four boys reach a bridge. They must decide whether to cross the bridge or walk an extra five miles to go around the bridge. This entire film represents the journey of childhood into adulthood, thus making the train tracks a symbol of the journey from one stage of life to another. The bridge, as well as the tracks in general, demonstrate that the path towards adulthood can be adventurous, dangerous, and downright scary. When the boys are about halfway across the tracks, a train comes along, forcing them to run. In this instance, the train symbolizes the trauma that the boys have experienced that have ultimately forced them to grow up quicker than average boys their age.
When the boys get close to finding the body, they again are forced to make a decision regarding the direction they take. They can either walk the train tracks or cross a field into a forest and ultimately decide to walk through the field. By choosing this path rather than the tracks, this shows that the boys desire to make their own destinies rather than follow the path that has already been paved for them by their family members, community members, and society itself. When the boys finally find the dead body, Gordie decides that they will not take credit for finding it, as that is not the way to prove themselves to their community. They report the body anonymously and return back home. Gordie and Chris say goodbye to the other boys a
