Countries participate in international and regional organizations for a variety of reasons including to leverage and benefit commerce as well as for security. Understanding the underlying dynamics of why these organizations have been selected and their impacts is an important aspect of the business environment.
– Identify the different global organizations and regional integrations Mexico belongs to
– Explain the purpose of regional integration and a global organization to which the selected country belongs.
Regional integration helps countries overcome divisions that impede the flow of goods, services, capital, people and ideas. The increasing economic integration of Mexico with the United States during the last three decades has benefited both countries significantly. Advantages to Mexico include greater product specialization and efficiency, and for both nations, a wider variety of goods and services at lower prices. Ever greater openness has been achieved through the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) since 1994, which included Canada, the United States and Mexico. Highly dynamic Mexican exports to the United States have implied markedly more Mexican imports from north of the border.
quired for the situation is extremely useful in understanding the fundamentals of leadership (Pettinger, 2007). Chelladurai in his Multi Dimensional Model of Leadership, expands on much of Fiedler’s theory but in a continuum based approach, in which the leader can adapt their leadership style to fit the situation (Chelladurai and Madella, 2006). Chelladurai’s theory is taken from sports psychology but can be applied to an organisational scenario. It provides a much more empirical categorisation of task structure, clearly differentiating a plethora of situations that require certain leadership styles for success. Chealldurai found three characteristics that affect the leadership style required for a situation, called antecedents, they mainly expand upon Fiedler’s situational factors and leader – member relations and ultimately affect how a leader should behave towards a situation. The first are situational characteristics, the environment in which the leader must perform, the second are leader characteristics, the experience, personal qualities and skills of the leader, and the third are member characteristics, the motivation, skill and experience levels of group members (Chelladurai and Madella, 2006). The situational characteristics and member characteristics have a required behaviour to ensure maximum group performance, they also have a preferred behaviour to ensure the satisfaction of group members, if the leaders actual behaviour matches both the required behaviour and preferred behaviour of the situation the consequence is maximum group performance and satisfaction. However, if the group are not performing and achieving goals or are not satisfied or both, then the leader is able to amend their actual behaviour to improve this. Leaders able to monitor performance and satisfaction, and understand what is required to amend the situation will achieve optimum group performance in Chelladurai’s model.
The one limitation of Chealldurai’s model is that it assumes the leader is in a position of complete positional power over the group, and can implement any leadership style of their choosing without constraints. Positional power is the authority and influence a leader has over a group, if the leader has positional power, they will be able to implement the leadership style they best see fit for the situation. Po