Regression

 

A psychologist is interested in Instagram ‘influencers’ and how many likes their most popular video receives. They hypothesise that four variables might contribute to the number of likes: the length of the video in seconds; the perceived attractiveness of the influencer; the sex of the influencer; and whether a dog is present in the video.

The psychologist conducts a multiple regression to predict the number of likes for the most popular video.

There are four predictor variables Length_of_video (in seconds) Dog_present (0 = no, 1 = yes) Attractiveness (0 – 10, higher number = greater rated attractiveness) Sex (0 = male, 1 = female)

SPSS output from the study is provided. Use the output to answer the questions:

Page 2 of 14 Page 3 of 14 Question 1a:

Examine the frequency tables for ‘Sex’ and ‘Dog_present’. The psychologist has made an error in their data entry. What error have they made, and how might this impact the analyses if it was not fixed? [3 marks]

Question 1b:

The psychologist spots and fixes the error. How much variance is explained in video likes by the four predictor variables? [2 marks]

Question 1c:

Write up the complete regression model in APA format, providing standardised (beta) coefficients. [10 marks]

Question 1d:

Calculate and provide the cut off value for Cook’s distance. [2 marks].

Question 1e:

Should the psychologist be concerned by influential cases in their analyses? Explain your answer. [3 marks]

Page 4 of 14 Question 2: Between Subjects ANOVA

A psychologist is interested in road-rage experienced by drivers of different types of vehicles (Bicycle, Motorcycle, Car, Van, Bus). They develop a road-rage scale which measures the average number of times a curse-word is uttered per 60 minutes of journey taken. More curse-words are indicative of greater road-rage.

The psychologist was conducting exploratory research and had no specific hypotheses regarding which drivers experienced the most road-rage.

SPSS output from the study is provided. Use the output to answer the questions:

Page 5 of 14 Page 6 of 14 Page 7 of 14 Question 2a:

Write up the full analysis and appropriate follow up tests. [12 marks]

Question 2b:

How much variance did the groups predict in road-rage score? [2 marks]

Question 2c:

If the psychologist decided not to conduct an ANOVA, but to conduct a series of t-tests, how many would they need to perform to compare all groups? [2 marks]

Question 2d:

In the Contrast Coefficient table above, what comparison would contrast 1 be testing? [2 marks]

Question 2e:

The psychologist has made an error in defining their contrasts. Explain what the error is. [2 marks]

Page 8 of 14 Question 3: Complex between subjects ANOVA

The current results are from a study exploring the influence of social media use on self-esteem, in male and female students.

Participants were recruited if they used one of the following forms of social media (and none of the others):

1- Facebook

2- Twitter

3- Instagram

This gave a three level between subjects factor of ‘social media’. Next, we recorded participants’ sex (a two level between subjects factor, coded as male or female). Finally, participants completed a self-esteem scale, in which higher scores are indicative of better self-esteem.

The design of the study was therefore a 3 x 2 between subjects design, with “Social media” as the first between subjects’ factor (Facebook / Twitter / Instagram) and “Sex” (Male / Female) as the second between subjects factor. The DV is self-esteem.

It was hypothesised that Instagram use will reduce self-esteem, and this reduction will be greater in females.

SPSS output from the study is provided. Use the output to answer the questions:

Page 9 of 14 Page 10 of 14 Page 11 of 14 Page 12 of 14 Page 13 of 14 Question 3a:

Produce an APA formatted descriptive statistics table. [5 marks]

Question 3b:

Do the data have homogeneity of variance? Explain your answer. [2 marks]

Question 3c:

Write up the main effects from the analysis, reporting post hoc tests where necessary. [6 marks]

Question 3d:

Write up the interaction, reporting post hoc tests where necessary. [5 marks]

Question 3e:

Do the results support the hypothesis? Briefly explain your answer. [2 marks]

 

Sample Solution

there might be some people who would prefer to deny the existence of any God so powerful, rather than believing that all other things are uncertain.” In other words, there are possibly other people who would deny that there is a God than to believe that everything else in the world does not exist. Descartes believes that God?

is being and all other things are not being. All other things in the world compared to God are subordinate because God is almighty.
Another one of Descartes’ theories in Meditation One is the Evil Demon Argument. It is also worth noting that is this not Descartes own position, but uses it as an argumentative device. The Evil Demon Argument states that an evil demon has the will, power, and the knowledge to make a person a constant victim of deception. Even one is thinking something is self-evidently true, it’s not.

There is a distinction between the mind and the body. The mind is essentially thinking and the body is essentially extended so that the two have nothing in common. In Descartes’ Meditations on Philosophy, there is a character, the mediator, and he reasons that he might cast all the opinions of others into doubt if he can doubt the foundations of basic principles upon which his opinions are founded.

In the first meditation, Descartes rejects as if false any belief that is open to doubt. He pushes skepticism to its limits by introducing the notion of an “evil demon”, a being that always tricks us into believing true what is actually

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.