Regulatory and accreditation standards

 

W​‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‌‌‍​hat impact do regulatory and accreditation standards have on the risk management process within health care organiza​‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‌‌‍​tions? Why do you think it’s important for you to understand how both affect risk management? Provide exampl​‌‍‍‍‌‍‍‌‍‌‌‍‍‍‌‍‌‌‌‍​es.

Sample Solution

Regulatory and accreditation standards

Accreditation and regulation play an important role in improving the quality and safety of health care. Regulation involves rules that must be followed, while accreditation is a seal of approval certifying that an organization or individual has met specific standards. Every healthcare organization establishes some sort of internal standards and rules for operations. But accreditation ensures that your organization meets regulations and standards set by a recognized, external organization. Accreditation in healthcare is a form of external review that shows that a healthcare provider is meeting regulations and standards set by an external accreditation organization. Accreditation in healthcare is not just about reputation. Going through the accreditation process helps streamline operations, improve the quality of care, and build trust with patients and the community.

expanded dramatically in the 1930s” (Gentzkow et al. 2986) and the first president to publicly communicate to the country in real time was Calvin Coolidge, in 1923 through the use of the radio (Morgan RealClear.com).
Public expectations of presidents changed with the introduction of the radio. During the golden age of American newspapers, public expectations of presidents were distinguished by the way they looked and what they were said to have said. With the introduction of radio, public expectations of presidents began to be shaped by how they talked and how they were perceived to behave, through speech. This changed the character of the presidency. “Public expectations of presidential communication formed in conjunction with the development of a more public rhetorical presidency at the beginning of the 20th century” (Scacco and Coe 302) and have continued to operate since that time. The concept of a rhetorical presidency is derived from political communication theory and is argued to be witnessed when “a decline in party strength and a changing media environment led presidents to bypass the bargaining processing in DC and “go public” with their policies instead” (Pluta 2). Rhetorical presidencies began in the 1930s, when Roosevelt, facing strong Congressional opposition to the New Deal policies that he was espousing to defeat the Great Depression, used radio to create a stronger relationship with the American people by appearing to be open, upfront and honest with them. Roosevelt’s rhetorical presidency accelerated in World War II, when Roosevelt used the radio to recreate the direct and immediate communication modes of earlier presidencies. However, while Roosevelt’s fireside chats and radio addresses were direct and immediate, they were also tightly scripted in order to garner ever-deeper support for the American war effort. In this way, presidential communications remained, as they had been with newspapers, heavily mediated.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.