Relational satisfaction

 

 

For this activity, you are tasked with designing an experiment studying one of the following variables:

Relational satisfaction
Self-esteem
Political preferences
Learning achievement
You must choose to include one of the variables listed above in your study. You can decide whether it is going to be your independent variable or your dependent variable. This means that you will choose at least one other variable to include in your study. This second variable can be anything (that would make logical sense to study in relationship to the variable you choose from the list above).

 

Step 1: Defining the Study (10pts)
Once you’ve chosen your variable of interest from the list above, you should begin your assignment by stating a clear research question that you are setting out to answer. Then you should identify your independent variable and dependent variable. You should also provide a conceptual definition and an operational definition for each. Your operational definition should reflect specific indicators that you identify as important for measuring your variables.

When outlining your IV and DV, you need to articulate at least one hypothesis

regarding the relationship you would expect to see between your variables. When stating your hypothesis, be sure to outline the direction of the correlation you would expect to see between your variables. You should also provide a rationale for your proposed hypothesis. That is, explain why you predict the relationship you outline in your hypothesis. (You may draw on a theory you’ve learned, from previous research you are familiar with to explain your prediction, or you may use logical reasoning to explain your prediction).

 

Step 2: Methods (20pts)
Discuss your proposed experimental design. First, identify your participants. Discuss how you will gather your sample, and whether you need to consider any inclusion criteria (who you will purposely include in your sample) or exclusion criteria (who you will purposely exclude). Be sure to clearly identify a sampling method (e.g., simple random sampling, convenience sampling) and outline how you plan to use that approach to gather your sample (i.e., practically how will you implement the sampling approach you choose – for instance, if you need a sampling frame, identify what it will be; if you decide to use snowball sampling, how will you identify your first few participants). You should justify your choice of sampling approach and discuss at least one benefit and one drawback inherent with your sampling choice.

Next, outline which experimental design you would choose (e.g., pre-test/post-test, Solomon 4 group, etc.) and then describe, based on your chosen design, what your experiment would look like. That is, walk us through your experiment in detail: Be sure to include a discussion of the differences between your control condition and experimental condition(s). This design should align with the IV and DV you outlined in Step 1.

 

Step 3: Critique (15pts)
First, discuss how your experiment addresses the three criteria of establishing causality in nomothetic studies. Next, identify at least one threat to internal validity and one threat to external validity in your design. Third, discuss at least one potential confounding variable that could introduce spuriousness into your results, and how you could attempt to address this confound.

Lastly, what are the overall weaknesses in your design? What are its strengths? Outline at least one reason why this design is superior to a survey design in answering your specific research question. Though you will not have any statistics to analyze, you should also discuss one potential instrumental and symbolic value of your hypothetical findings (that is, assuming that your findings support your hypothesis, how are your findings likely to be instrumentally and symbolically relevant?)

Using the criteria and format suggested above, write your responses to the prompts above.
This is an exercise, not a formal paper, so you do not need to be concerned about an introductory paragraph or topic sentences. However, we ask that the exercise be 5-6 pages long, double-spaced, so we can get them back to you in a timely fashion. Your responses should address all of the questions raised above and you should make an effort to connect your responses to concepts discussed in class. Be sure to proof and correct your work.

 

 

Sample Solution

orn a blank canvas and their lives are determined by varying experiences, positive interactions whilst acquiring different attributes and not due to DNA. She believed men and women were born equal and brains were malleable by culture, life experiences and desires, whereas Freud (1961) argued this and believed men and women’s brains were very different and the way they were formed was wholly down to DNA. Freud (1961) founded the study of psychoanalysis, he believed traumas and unresolved issues during childhood could be coaxed out by sensitive talk therapy. This can be seen in settings today by way of one:one counselling or through emotional literacy. Place2Be (1994) delivers school based therapeutic interventions. A large study was carried out on 47,000 children in primary schools, based on the findings of Place2Be, children’s social and emotional wellbeing had improved as perceived by their family members and teachers following interventions (White Et al., 2009). Supporting this Fox and Butler (2007) carried out a small-scale study on 219 pupils, attempting to discover whether counselling is successful in schools. The results suggested that the treatment delivered to the children, had less distress and fewer problems were observed. However, they recommended further research is required, to discover when and to who it was more of a success to. The evidence suggests that pupils receiving psychological therapies were a success however, The National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE, 2010) expressed the opinion and recommended several forms of therapy as first-line interventions, not talk therapy or counselling in isolation. Another essential point regarding one:one counselling and emotional literacy is the relationship a child has with the facilitator. Mindmatters (n.d.) advocates how vital it is for children to have a trusting and caring relationship with the individual, as a result of this trust and understanding, will promote open communication. Similarly, Bowlby (1969) suggested that children come into this world with an innate response of survival; form attachments to survive. Consequently, if secure attachments are not formed this would lead to distress and negative experiences concluding that a trusting relationship is not formed between the pupil and the facilitator. Belsky and Fearon (2002) support Bowlby and state ‘poor attachment outcomes are associated with long-term adverse consequences in cognitive, adaptive, and behavioral domains’. Comparing Maslow (1968c), Bronfenbrenner (1979) Sameroff (2010) and Shonokoff an

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.