Relationship between TAXRICH1 and RACE.

at
Categories
Tags

1) Make a hypothesis for the relationship between TAXRICH1 and RACE. Make TAXRICH1 the dependent variable and RACE the independent variable.
2) Is the relationship depicted in the crosstabs a positive or negative relationship? Explain and support your answer. If you think the direction of the relationship is not meaningful for your variables say so and explain why.
3) Is the relationship observed in your crosstabulation results a weak, moderate or strong one? Report the LAMBDA (look in the value cell of the directional measures table – the attitudes about taxes for the rich dependent) and CRAMER’S V (look in the value cell of the symmetric measures table for cramer’s V) produced by SPSS to defend your answer. .Remember that values of Lambda and Cramer’s V between 0-0.3 is weak, 0.3 to 0.5 is moderate and 0.5+ is strong.
4) Is the relationship depicted in the crosstabs statistically significant or not? Look in the chi square test table for the relevant information. Report the value of the PEARSON CHI SQUARE, the DEGREES OF FREEDOM(DF) and the probability associated with the chi square(look in THE ASYMPTOTIC SIGNIFICANCE CELL OF THE PEARSON CHI SQUARE for this probability). Remember that when this probability is less than or equal to .05, the relationship observed in the crosstab is statistically significant. You must reject the null hypothesis of no relationship between your dependent and independent variables. You will therefore be left with the alternative hypothesis that there is a relationship between the two variables in the population. However, if the probability associated with the chi square statistic is larger than 0.05, then the relationship is statistically nonsignificant, meaning that the relationship is likely due to random chance and you cannot reject the null hypothesis of no relationship in the population.
5) Is the relationship observed in the crosstabulation table consistent or not consistent with your hypothesis? If you cannot reject the null hypothesis of no relationship then you have to conclude that the relationship observed in the crosstabulation table is not consistent with your hypothesis, unless you made a null hypothesis, which is not usually done. However, if you can reject the null hypothesis, you may still conclude that the relationship is not consistent with your hypothesis. You have to compare the relationship observed in the crosstabulation table with the hypothesis you made to decide whether the former is consistent or not consistent with the latter. Please explain your answer.

 

Pat b:

1) Make a hypothesis involving CAPPUN and RACE. Treat CAPPUN as the dependent variable and RACE as the independent variable.
2) What are the levels of measurement for the dependent and the independent variables?
3) What measures of association are appropriate for assessing the strength of the relationship?
4) Discuss the relationship depicted in the crosstabs table, using selected percentage data to support your claims.
5) Is the relationship observed in your crosstabulation results a weak, moderate or strong one? Inspect the LAMBDA and CRAMER’S V produced by SPSS and use them to answer. Be sure to report numbers to support your statements.
6) Use the chi-square statistic (PEARSON CHI-SQUARE) and its degrees of freedom (DF) to examine whether the relationship is statistically significant or not. Is the relationship depicted in the crosstabs statistically significant or not? Look in the chi square test table for the relevant information. Report the value of the PEARSON CHI SQUARE, the DEGREES OF FREEDOM(DF) and the probability associated with the chi square(look in THE ASYMPTOTIC SIGNIFICANCE CELL OF THE PEARSON CHI SQUARE for this probability). Remember that when this probability is less than or equal to .05, the relationship observed in the crosstab is statistically significant. You must reject the null hypothesis of no relationship between your dependent and independent variables. You will therefore be left with the alternative hypothesis that there is a relationship between the two variables in the population. However, if the probability associated with the chi square statistic is larger than 0.05, then the relationship is statistically nonsignificant, meaning that the relationship is likely due to random chance and you cannot reject the null hypothesis of no relationship in the population.
7) Is the relationship observed in the crosstabulation table consistent or not consistent with your hypothesis? If you cannot reject the null hypothesis of no relationship then you have to conclude that the relationship observed in the crosstabulation table is not consistent with your hypothesis, unless you made a null hypothesis, which is not usually done. However, if you can reject the null hypothesis, you may still conclude that the relationship is not consistent with your hypothesis. You have to compare the relationship observed in the crosstabulation table with the hypothesis you made to decide whether the former is consistent or not consistent with the latter. Explain whatever answer you give.

Sample Solution

ommunication skills play a vital role in project management. It is one of the mandatory soft skill that a project manager should have. Project managers should have the ability to convey the ideas clearly and effectively and should also allow the team members to speak openly and honestly. It is the key to success in areas such as software development where people are involved. Each project should have a good communication plan. Each project can have a same or different method for delivering the information. The communication plan includes the type of information the project manager delivers and the timing of the release and distribution. The methods of communication can be in many forms such as emails, written reports, conversations, meetings.
Communication plays a major role when it comes to mergers & acquisitions (M&A) performance. Using project management tools like project logs, progress reports, and periodic reviews can help better communication and responsible documentation of individual and teamwork. By documenting and following this process can evaluate the progress of the project and team members. This, in turn, enables regular and systematic description and evaluation of individual contributions and overall team performance. The regular documentation of individual input helps to push all team members to act ethically throughout the project, that is, to contribute their fair share of work to the project. The frequent use of documentation helps to cultivate the habit of reflection in action by enculturating students to the practice of regularly examining individual and teamwork and constantly evaluating the amount and quality of work done. It also facilitates frequent reflection on strengths and weaknesses demonstrated in individual and teamwork, lessons learned during the project, and possible ways to work more closely and efficiently as a team in the future.
Literature Review
Belzer (2004) discussed the importance of Communication skills for the project managers. According to him, Communication skills are one of the mandatory skills for the project managers and they should have the ability to express the ideas clearly with their team members for the successful exec

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.
Hi, how can I help?