1. What are the advantages for a country of protectionism?
2. Should protectionism be seen as a short-term or permeant measure? What is the historical evidence?
3. What are the advantages for a country of free trade?
4. Should free trade be completely free or limited. Does free trade only comes in the second phase?
5. For National development plans, are they socialism?
6. Can National development plans be reconciled with a market economy?
7. Which sectors of the economy should or could, be guided or financed by government?
Relative advantages of protectionism and free trade
Protectionism is the practice of following protectionist trade policies. A protectionist trade policy allows the government of a country to promote domestic producers, and thereby boost the domestic production of goods and services by imposing tariffs or otherwise limiting foreign goods and services in the marketplace. Advantages of protectionism include: 1. More growth opportunities; protectionism provides local industries with growth opportunities until they can compete against more experienced firms in the international market. 2. Lower imports; protectionist policies help reduce import levels and allow the country to increase its trade balance. 3. More jobs; higher employment rates result when domestic firms boost their workforce. 4. Higher GDP; protectionist policies tend to boost the economy`s GDP due to a rise in domestic production. By having manufacturing for defense items protected from foreign competition, trade protectionism is necessary for a nation`s existence.
e applicable in sectors such as agriculture where many performance results are dependent on factors beyond organization and employee control. Whichever the compensation used, it should also be fair with the market and not discriminating against some employees (Campbell, 2006). A job evaluation should be conducted in placing a value on employee. In such an evaluation, compensable factors such as experience, education level and job responsibility should be considered. Moreover, employees should be involved when considering their indirect compensation needs such as paid vacation, retirement planning, childcare among others. The HRM officer should regularly review the compensation package from time to time to maintain its fairness, equitability and competitiveness.
Use of compensation and incentives is an importance practice in HRM as it has the following advantages. First, to many employees, the basic purpose for joining an organization is to secure a pay. The value placed in such a pay and not necessarily the amount/size motivates the employees more, and as result higher productivity levels are reported. Second, compensation facilitates hiring, retention, promotion and evaluation of the workforce. Without mentioning aspects of compensation, the HRM office might find it impossible to convince people to join the organization to work or even the existing employees to assume higher responsibilities (Armstrong, 2006). Third, compensation displays legality of a contract/employment. For a contract to be valid there has to be a consideration, which is partly what a pay or remuneration package serves. Compensation, especially bonuses, which practice sharing of profits with the employees, creates a sense of belonging to the employees. This is extremely important in securing employees’ loyalty during hard times in managerial practices.
In addition, compensation assists in valuing an organization as well as determining its future. Once the HRM office is capable of properly remunerating workforce, the employees are almost assured of their organization’s survival. Usually, when an organization is going under receivership, employees are the first victim as there is reduced employee compensation, which may in acute scenarios deny them their basic livelihood. Finally, compensation and incentives are the easiest motivational practices available for use by the HRM. This is because compensation is directly linked to employee’s welfare more than the improvement of working conditions (McCoy, 19