https://www.ted.com/talks/taika_waititi_why_humor_is_key_to_creativityHow to cite a TED Talk Speaker (last name, first name). “Title of presentation.” Title of Overall Web Site. Sponsoring organization, date of presentation. Date of access (day month year). Bittman, Mark. “What’s Wrong with What We Eat.” TED.com. TED Conferences, LLC, Dec 2007.. 18 May 2009. Parenthetical Citation: (Bittman 3:56) – note the minute and second marker for the spot in the video from which you took the quote Steps to complete the project: Watch the TED talk. Read the transcript. Determine the goals of the speaker. Why is the speaker giving this talk? What do they want to audience to understand? Write detailed notes and cite where in the talk each technique occurs. Use your notes to then make a new outline as to what main techniques the speaker uses to persuade the audience of his or her goals and evaluate how successful you think the speaker is in accomplishing these goals. What rhetorical strategies and techniques does the speaker use and is the speaker successful in persuading the audience of his or her goals based on these techniques? Attachments ENGL 1301 Rhetorical Analysis Essay for a TED talk.docx(19.03 KB)
The goal of this study is to describe the remarks made on Sir Ken Robinson’s TED.com address, “Do Schools Kill Creativity?,” as well as the manner in which they were made. The research’s data consisted of 50 comments on videos from the years 2016 to 2020 that discussed the speaker or talk style without addressing the talk’s subject matter. This study used Tsou, A., et alcomment .’s theory analysis (2014). The coding procedure and content analysis were utilized to determine the speaker’s delivery approach. According to the research’s findings, there were 38 comments on the speaker’s delivery overall, followed by 13 and 2 comments, respectively, on the speaker’s praise and criticism.
Hadrian’s appearance in Britain was a flash that lighted a fire of progress and improvement. During the subsequent 100 years, quite a bit of London was obliterated by discharge, and when the nation was revamped to an area of around 325 sections of land, it turned into Rome’s biggest northern domain by far. Britons have generally consistently esteemed the wide open more than city life, as apparent by their plain urban communities and appealing nurseries, and hence a considerable lot of different urban communities that were revamped by the Romans wound up lessening in size, as opposed to growing. The occupants just needed to live in the excellence of nature, and moved out of their towns dramatically as the wide open was created. The most huge and dependable achievement during the time that Rome remade its English region was the plan and finish of Hadrian’s Wall.
Hadrian predicted a harmonious relationship that he and the British domain could share. It depended on his requirement for labor, which Britain had a lot to credit out. Consequently, Hadrian would strengthen the domain and shield it from the northern savages. His past mobilized security encounters generally gave him an extensive part of land to keep record of; yet since Britain was encircled by water in many bearings his most memorable motivation was to construct a wall. Thinking back on his battle at the Rhine-Danube district, that’s what hadrian knew whether a tactical power were to be compromised a fortification worked for retreat would just lead them far too much. His essential psyche persuaded him to think that portability was urgent in excess strategically hostile, so an arrangement of strongholds spread out to build the area of control and correspondence was his optimal choice.
Hadrian’s Wall started close to the River Tyne and extended the whole way to the Solway. It wasn’t intended to be monitored at each point along its length, yet rather go about as a framework that would drive the traffic of his foes. “Since its course was plotted starting with one normal benefit then onto the next, the wall appears to have picked the most troublesome course across the English open country.” It moves to soak precipices and grips to risky edges. Foe powers wouldn’t just manage a man-made wall in their way, yet by and large they wound up confronted with normal designs that made crossing the wall considerably more troublesome; also the trench on the north side of the wall that was 27 feet wide and nine feet down. “The entryways permitted the section of troops for activities toward the north and were places where non military personnel traffic among north and south could be controlled.” The wall was planned to be made of mortared brick work up until the River Irving, where limestone