“Construct your own 2-3 page Rogerian argument essay in which you attempt to arrive at a workable solution or “middle ground.”
1. Summary of Positions
❒ Have you briefly introduced the author and publication context (year, journal, etc.) of Article 1?
❒ Have you included a summary of the stance presented in Article 1?
❒ Have you briefly introduced the author and publication context (year, journal, etc.) of Article 2?
❒ Have you included a summary of the stance presented Article 2?
2. Thesis/Claim
❒ Does you claim address both sides of the issue, including specific points raised in the articles?
❒ Does your claim present a clear, workable solution that could be viewed as a “middle ground” between the two sides?
3. Analysis
❒ Have you backed up your claim using facts from both sides of the argument?
❒ When using direct quotations, have you supplemented them with your own explanation of their relevance?
4. Reflection
❒ Have you answered all reflection questions thoughtfully and included insights, observations, and/or examples in all responses?
❒ Are your answers included on a separate page below the main assignment?
B. Reflection
1. How does the Rogerian model of argument help you better understand the topic that’s being discussed? Why is it a good practice to acknowledge both sides of the argument? (3-4 sentences)
2. Will you use the Rogerian Approach in your own argumentative essay?
environmental synergies. An effective program means that some design ideas are reducing this consumption and emissions in this way. The author mentioned that human ecological design proactively interfaces people with environments by constructing a built environment. By implementing, the human experience is within the space and place. The details that obtain meaning from the whole, human ecological design establishes new spaces, their sense of place and their environmental interfaces. According to the theory of Human Ecological Design, the design and construction of the buildings we live, work and rebuild, profoundly affect human experience, health, well-being and the environment steady (Caplan, 2016). By considering human needs and sustainable design concepts, this approach can better play the role and purpose of architecture for human design. The architectural theory of sustainable technology connects the relationship between people and the relationship between architecture and the natural environment. When integrated with the design process, these factors can positively impact the design’s results.
In conclusion, the theory and direction of interior space design are based on human
needs and the importance of perception and cognition of space and place design. In order to obtain more profound theoretical research results and better design projects, designers still need further research and practice to get an accurate basis; however, as seen in the experience presented thesis, designers have a good start on the space, place meaning and design.
Rapoport, A. (1970). The study of spatial quality. Journal of Aesthetic Education, 4(4), 81-95.
Lidwell, W., Holden, K., & Butler, J. (2010). Universal principles of design: 125 ways to enhance usability, influence perception, increase appeal, make better design decisions, and teach through design. Beverly, Mass: Rockport Publishers.
Ganoe, C. J. (1999). Design as narrative: A theory of inhabiting interior space. Journal of Interior Design, 25(2), 1-15. doi:10.1111/j.1939-1668.1999.tb00340.x
Caplan, B. (2016). Buildings are for people: Human ecological design. Chicago: Libri Publishing.
INDS-706
Sylvia Han
Pro. Gray
Winter 2019
Argument Paper 2 In this argument paper, I would like to discuss that the social theory’s function of humans and society plays an essential role in the design of social theory in the direction of indoor space. The purpose of the design is to solve these seemingly simple questions – “Is this useful for these people?” and “Is this solution better than this?” Therefore, through simpler problems, it reflects the problems that interior design needs to solve and causes people to think. For example, Interior designers need to use critical thinking and design methods that combine user needs to design interior programs. Some theories fact are reflected in interior design, such as the way of thinking, understanding direction and critical logic. Based on designers’ thinking, it is essential that the art, design and gestalt theories support and influence of theory on the expertise of design projects. Designers want to mention critical thinking. The author Eidson, Patricia L, an outstanding scholar in the field of interior design and architectural design, mentioned in his article that critical thinking is a dualistic concept that couples modes of designing with certain theories of criticism. Theoretical and historical ideas that influenced changes in interior design and architecture are presented in a timeline context to illustrate the aspects of evaluating, interpreting and describing, which are parts o