Role technology can play in allowing employees to work at home.

 

A large technology company’s CEO decided as one part of his or her plan to revitalize the company that he or she wanted to end the company’s work-from-home policy. In an internal memo from the Executive Vice President of People and Development, working at the office rather than at home was necessary because of the need for employees to communicate and collaborate and to reduce the chance that speed and quality would be diminished. Criticism of the firm’s policy change focused on the message that not allowing work from home sends to employees: We can’t trust you to get the work done.

Many employees want to work at home, so companies are using working at home as a benefit that helps recruit and retain talented employees. Several studies have demonstrated benefits from working at home. Cisco Systems found that employees who could work remotely from home experienced an increase in their quality of life. This could result from reducing the hassles of commuting to work and allowing employees to better balance work and life responsibilities such as managing childcare, running errands, or dealing with a sick child, spouse, or family member. Another study showed that when employees of a Chinese travel agency were allowed to work from home, they were more productive, resulting in cost savings of $2,000 per employee each year. Finally, a study found that office employees who work from home may work fifty-seven hours per week before they feel their work-life is out of balance, compared to thirty-eight hours per week for employees who work at their office.

Working at home also may have significant disadvantages. The disadvantages include employees taking advantage of the policy to extend their weekends by not working in the office on Fridays or Mondays and the loss of the potential benefit from having face-to-face interactions with colleagues that are useful for sharing knowledge and generating creative solutions to product or service problems. Being in the office is especially important today because many jobs require close collaboration with peers or working on team projects. Also, unplanned personal interactions occurring at the office can lead to new ideas or working relationships. The biggest problems for employees working from home is overcoming other employees’ and managers’ perceptions that they are not as productive as they could be, that they lack focus, and that they lose “face time,” which leads to fewer opportunities for promotions.

Tasks: 3 references cited for each to the least please…
1. Analyze whether companies should have a policy that allows all employees to work at home.
2. Evaluate which jobs are best suited for working at home.
3. Analyze what role technology can play in allowing employees to work at home.
4. Explain whether the interaction using technology can replace interpersonal face-to-face interaction between employees or between employees and their manager.
5. Determine why some employees don’t take advantage of flexible work options such as working at home, for example, some believe it hurts their career.

Sample Solution

Role technology play in allowing employees to work at home

Companies should have a policy that allows employees to work from home because working from home employment offers businesses the opportunity to reduce costs and increase employee satisfaction. The Penn State study uncovered a startling fact, that telecommuting does not blur boundaries between work and family. In fact, it reduces conflicts that typically occur between work and family life. Employees call out of work less, and work continues to be accomplished at home at the same rate. Adaptive WiFi, video calling services, instant communication tools, project management platforms, and digital assistants are some of the roles technology play in allowing employees to work at home. As working from becomes a necessary reality for more and more workers, some may struggle to adapt to the new environment but using technology to your advantage can make settling in a bit smoother.

Upon completion of this process, the DJS intake officer must make a determination among three options for handling the referral: 1) refuse authorization to file the petition for a lack of legal sufficiency or some other factor; 2) propose an informal adjustment of the complaint, which may include “informal case processing” by DJS and referral to programs such as Restorative Response, Teen Court, or Mountain Manor; or 3) authorize the petition and forward the case to the State’s Attorney’s Office for further processing. For the purposes of this assessment, CCLP regards both refusal to authorize the filing of a petition and informal adjustment as diversionary processes that end or limit involvement with the youth justice system.

During the intake process, DJS must also determine whether a young person can safely return home with a parent or caregiver while his or her case is pending, and if so, whether certain conditions are necessary to ensure public safety while the young person awaits resolution of his or her case. In only the most serious cases, the intake officer may deem that secure detention is necessary to ensure public safety. Conditions, supervision, and community-based programs used as alternatives to secure detention represent a special type of diversion, which is addressed in the next section of this assessment report.

CCLP identified three significant barriers to diversion at DJS Intake. First, stakeholder interviews revealed that there is a need to strengthen DJS diversion policies, protocols and decision-making criteria at intake. Stakeholders noted that aspects of DJS’s current diversion policy are unclear and do not incorporate a clear and strong presumption for diversion in appropriate cases. The ambiguity in these policies can result in a significant level of subjectivity among intake officers, including a reluctance to divert cases in the absence of clear guidelines. Additionally, the absence of clear policies or guidelines may mean that some intake officers are engaging in practices that are narrowing diversion opportunities. For example, although DJS rescinded a policy that required youth to admit to an offense in order to be eligible for diver

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.