Safe Drinking Water
Choose an environmental health issue or concern in your community. Thoroughly review the hazard, including its effect on people, the interventions that could or should take place, and the role that nurses should play in reducing or eliminating this hazard. Post your findings in an essay.
EWG Tap Water Database | Pembroke, Town of
https://www.ewg.org/tapwater/system.php?pws=NC0378020
Sample Solution
The Town of Pembroke, North Carolina is a small town located in Robeson County. According to the Environmental Working Group’s (EWG) Tap Water Database, the municipal water system in Pembroke has had several violations since 2004. The main hazard that was detected was high levels of disinfection byproducts such as Haloacetic Acids which can have potentially harmful effects on human health when consumed at excessive amounts (EWG, 2020).
The presence of these pollutants may be due to several factors including insufficient filtration processes used by the local water treatment plant or improper storage or handling practices employed by its operators. In order to reduce or eliminate this hazard from entering drinking water sources, certain interventions must be taken. These include conducting regular maintenance and testing of all equipment involved in providing safe water; ensuring adequate filtration methods are used; improving storage and transport protocols for treated water and implementing proper operator training programs for personnel responsible for maintaining public health standards.
When it comes to nurses’ role in reducing this hazard, they should take an active approach towards educating members of their communities on how best to protect themselves from potential contaminants found in their drinking water sources. Additionally, they should work closely with public health officials such as environmental scientists or local government representatives so they can coordinate suitable strategies that would help reduce contamination levels while still providing clean drinking water access for all those living within their area.
regards to the osmosis of pieces into lumps. Mill operator recognizes pieces and lumps of data, the differentiation being that a piece is comprised of various pieces of data. It is fascinating to take note of that while there is a limited ability to recall lumps of data, how much pieces in every one of those lumps can change broadly (Miller, 1956). Anyway it's anything but a straightforward instance of having the memorable option huge pieces right away, somewhat that as each piece turns out to be more natural, it very well may be acclimatized into a lump, which is then recollected itself. Recoding is the interaction by which individual pieces are 'recoded' and allocated to lumps. Consequently the ends that can be drawn from Miller's unique work is that, while there is an acknowledged breaking point to the quantity of pieces of data that can be put away in prompt (present moment) memory, how much data inside every one of those lumps can be very high, without unfavorably influencing the review of similar number