A review of 200 days-away-from-work injuries for a large, multi-facility corporation was conducted, and it was determined that 18 of them were due to lower back injuries. Only 14.3 were expected under normal conditions. The rest of the injuries were due to other causes where 185.7 were expected. What is the chi-square value? Discuss whether there was a significant difference in observed data vs. the expected data. Also, discuss how the process of hypothesis testing might prove helpful to the safety professional.
Summary of the data:
Observed data: 18 lower back injuries and 182 other injuries
Expected: 14.3 lower back injuries and 185.7 other injuries
A chi-square (χ2) statistic is a test that measures how a model compares to actual observed data. The data used in calculating a chi-square statistic must be random, raw, mutually exclusive, drawn from independent variables, and drawn from a large enough sample. For example, the results of tossing a fair coin meet these criteria. Chi-square tests are often used in hypothesis testing. The chi-square statistic compares the size any discrepancies between the expected results and the actual results, given the size of the sample and the number of variables in the relationship. For these tests, degrees of freedom are utilized to determine if a certain null hypothesis can be rejected based on the total number of variables and samples within the experiment. As with any statistic, the larger the sample size, the more reliable the results.
Vengeance
Vengeance of the show “Hamlet” [Title] [Original] I will disclose how to utilize foil in the play. The four foils I use are as per the following. [As brought up in this class, the foil is a letter, not “between letters”. Foil is a little character supporting the fundamental character. [Frag – 1] is an individual who is comparable or not the same as the fundamental character. [The foils ought to be diverse regardless of whether they are comparative. Laertes and Gertrude are only a couple of the individuals you are attempting to help.
The awfulness of vengeance (once in a while called retribution dramatization, retribution show or bleeding misfortune) is a sort of hypothesis whose fundamental subject is the lethal aftereffect of vengeance and vengeance. American instructor Ashley H. Thorndiek formally reported the awfulness of vengeance in the 1902 article “Connection among Hamlet and contemporary retribution dramatization”, recorded the advancement of the hero’s retribution plan, and regularly killers and Avengers Brought about his own passing. This sort previously showed up in the early current British distributed by Thomas Kid’s “Misfortune of Spain” in the second 50% of the sixteenth century. Early works, for example, Jasper Heywood ‘s Seneca (1560’ s), Thomas Norton and Thomas Sackville ‘s play Gorbuduc (1561) were likewise viewed as a misfortune of vengeance. Different misfortunes of well known vengeance incorporate the awfulness of William Shakespeare’s Hamlet (1599-1602), Titus Andronics (1588-1593), Thomas Middleton’s Avengers (around 1606).
In this investigation of vengeance and retribution of Elizabeth ‘s retribution, the two plays I see are the “Hamlet” of William Shakespeare and “The Tragedy of Avengers” of Thomas Middleton. After first observing the treatment of the writer ‘s Avengers’ character, different characters in the play will deal with the Avengers. Their fundamental subject is like adhering to the competition, however the two dramatizations present a differentiating picture … Hamlet – a misfortune of vengeance? Shakespeare’s misfortune A puzzling arrangement of contemplations identified with vengeance of Hamlet makes this article an intriguing encounter. Ruth Nevo clarifies the vulnerability involved by the hero’s most renowned monolog in Acts 3 and 4 in vengeance. I can not peruse the talk