SAGE Business Cases

 

Read the case Links to an external site.about the recently promoted Melissa Richardson. This is a common situations individuals find themselves in as they move into management as they often have insufficient experience, training, and support.

SAGE Business Cases – Growing Managers_ Moving from Team Member to Team Leader.pdfDownload SAGE Business Cases – Growing Managers_ Moving from Team Member to Team Leader.pdf

Answer the following questions:

What do you consider to be the biggest issue that Melissa needs to handle in order to be successful in her new position?
What would you do if you were Melissa (other than go back to your old job)?

 

Sample Solution

The biggest issue that Melissa needs to handle in order to be successful in her new position is developing effective communication and trust with her team members (Mastrangelo & O’Neill, 2020). As a newly appointed leader of the team, Melissa needs to establish a good rapport with everyone and ensure that any questions or concerns are addressed promptly. Additionally, she must develop a strong understanding of each team member’s individual strengths and weaknesses so that she can delegate tasks accordingly. Lastly, Melissa should strive to create an atmosphere of transparency where ideas can be freely shared without fear of judgement or retribution.

Establishing these relationships takes time but it is essential for creating an environment where people feel comfortable enough to work together effectively. With clear communication channels that allow for direct feedback from all involved parties, teams can foster collaboration more easily (Hammond et al., 2017). Moreover, by recognizing the importance of each individual team member’s contributions and empowering them with ownership over their projects, Melissa will make sure everyone feels valued which will motivate them further (Tubre et al., 2016).

Homegrown regulations can be characterized as a set or arrangement of rules in which a nation perceives as it an administrative capability toward individuals from its general public which might be upheld using punishments. With the sole special cases of the Unified Realm, Israel and New Zealand, most different nations base their homegrown regulations on a solitary, classified report ensuring the chose freedoms of its residents and expressing the rules that everyone must follow. An illustration of a classified constitution is that of the US of America. The Joins States constitution is maybe the most renowned illustration of a classified constitution because of its unbending nature, particularly so despite large number of passings because of shootings the nation over, and the legislatures steady reluctance in canceling or correcting the Subsequent Revision Right To Remain battle ready. Indeed, even with basically overall judgment of their reluctance to cancel or change the subsequent revision, it is as yet holding areas of strength for up. The global local area has nothing to do with the homegrown laws of an administration as that would be considered as subverting the sway of a country.

The Unified Realm then again, don’t have a solitary systematized record. All things being equal, their “constitution” depends on various significant records that have been composed from the beginning of time. These records incorporate the Magna Carta of 1215, the Bill of Freedoms in 1689, the Common liberties Demonstration of 1998 and the Crown Demonstration of 2013 just to give some examples. Homegrown regulation is established by the 3 principal parts of government, to be specific the administrative, the legal executive as well as the chief. In the US, it is broadly acknowledged that established matchless quality is the best approach, while in the Assembled Realm, parliament rules. The Common freedoms Demonstration of 1998 is a significant type of global regulation that plainly characterizes the privileges of every individual resident in the Unified Realm, and is maybe the main cross-over of homegrown and worldwide regulation. Basically, this actually intends that on the off chance that someone in the UK feels as though their privileges have been disregarded, they can rather go to the European courts to pursue their case.

Worldwide regulation is characterized as a bunch of rules commonly viewed as restricting with regards to the connections between countries. The fundamental distinction between worldwide regulation and homegrown regulation is the way that global regulation isn’t generally so worried about individual freedoms, yet rather the connection between countries. Where homegrown regulations oversee the way of behaving of people inside the states, global regulation administers the way of behaving of the actual states. Worldwide regulation is shaped through the purposes of deals, shows, accords and arrangements instead of depending on a solitary authoritative body. Today nonetheless, there have been a development in global regulation to incorporate standards that oversee the freedoms of people too. This is known as Global Confidential Regulation. Worldwide confidential regulation as a rule manages individual contentions, for example, marriage and agreements questions, where theres either a decision or struggle of purview. The standards overseeing the direct of states falls under the domain of Public Worldwide Regulation. Supranational regulations are territorial worldwide regulations, an

This question has been answered.

Get Answer