Salary Increase

 

Your employer offers 2 options as an increase to your salary for the next year:
Option 1: You can have a 2.5% increase of your median annual salary.
Option 2: You can take an increase of $1500 added to your annual salary.
 Find the new annual salary for both Option 1 and Option 2 for the college graduate. Show your calculations.
Which option should you choose as a college graduate? Explain why using an absolute change or relative
change statement in your response.
 Find the new annual salary for both Option 1 and Option 2 for the high school graduate. Show your
calculations. Which option should the high school graduate choose? Explain why using an absolute change
or relative change statement in your response.

 

Sample Solution

Option 1: To calculate the new annual salary with a 2.5% increase, one must first find the median annual salary for the college graduate. Assuming this to be $30,000, then to calculate the new annual salary using Option 1 multiply by .025 and add it to the original amount:
Original Salary + (Original Salary x .025) = New Salary
$30,000 + ($30,000 X .025) = 30,750
This means that with Option 1 of a 2.5% increase in median salary annually, their new yearly salary would be $30,750.

Option 2: To calculate the new annual salary with an additional $1500 added on top of their existing median income as a college graduate they simply need to add together both amounts:
Original Salary + Additional Amount = New Salary
$30,000 + 1500 = 31,500

Therefore with Option 2 of adding an additional $1,500 annually instead of a percentage change in income their resulting yearly salary would be $31.500.

The option which should be chosen as a college graduate depends primarily on personal preference because both options result in different absolute changes and relative changes. An absolute change is defined as “the difference between two values” (Khan Academy 2019). In terms of Option 1 there was an absolute change from $30k/year to $7k/year or an increase of approximately 0.2%. A relative change is when “you compare how much one value has changed relative to another value” (Khan Academy 2019). For example if we look at Option 2 there was an absolute change from $30k/year to 31.5k/year representing a 5% relative increase in wages.

If you are looking for immediate growth then choosing option two may present advantages due to its larger relative wage increase; however if you are looking for more steady long-term growth then Option 1 may suit your needs better due its smaller but consistent rate of wage increases over time.

at times supplanted by a quick n-bit convey spread viper. A n by n exhibit multiplier requires n2 AND doors, n half adders, and n2 , 2n full adders. The Variable Correction Truncated Multiplication technique gives a proficient strategy to re-ducing the power dissemination and equipment necessities of adjusted exhibit multipliers. With this strategy, the diagonals that produce the t = n , k least critical item pieces are disposed of. To make up for this, the AND doors that create the halfway items for section t , 1 are utilized as contributions to the changed adders in segment t. Since the k excess changed full adders on the right-hand-side of the cluster don’t have to create item bits, they are supplanted by adjusted decreased full adders (RFAs), which produce a convey, yet don’t deliver a total. To add the consistent that revises for adjusting mistake, k , 1 of the MHAs in the second column of the exhibit are changed to altered concentrated half adders (SHAs). SHAs are identical to MFAs that have an informat

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.