Salem Witch Trials

 

te: Exploring American Histories by Nancy A Hewitt, Steven F Lawson. I want this essay to answer the following questions,
Where did this start—not location, but people? What kind of people? What was their religious/cultural background?

Who was considered a “witch” and who was considered a “victim” of the witchcraft? Not names, but kinds of people…

Who or what was blamed, ultimately, by the people of the era? (the underlying cause of the witchcraft)

Who or what caused it, according to the historians consulted? (this can be book, video, presentation, or all three–just be clear on which and indicate it in your parenthetical. I if you are referencing more than one, put the sources in one parenthetical like this: (Hewitt 213, Montgomery “Witch Craze”). Yes, you can shorten that, too, it as long as your reader can identify it.

Did this spread to other towns/areas? If so, how and why?

Who or what made it end?

Did the video discuss how this might be related to anything back in Europe? If so (briefly), what?

Does anything in the video contradict what the book or the presentation says about this phenomenon? What was portrayed differently? Do you feel like the video was accurate or slanted or…?

What was at least one major difference between what happened in Salem and what happened in Europe?
What was your final lasting impression of these events and/or how we teach and remember them? (This question does not need citation)

Sample Solution

ve longitudinal review with 175 kids between mean periods of 6.10 and 12.18, analysts evaluated compassion, moral thinking, and culpability as impacts on participation, aiding, and partaking in a companion climate. The outcomes show that compassion predicts aiding, participation, and sharing; moral thinking and culpability trouble additionally connect with compassion to foresee aiding and collaboration. Both compassion and responsibility pity were connected to the advancement of sharing. The review grows past exploration on moral feelings and moral thinking being developed of different prosocial practices (for example participation, helping, sharing) across center youth, and gives understanding on the way that these feelings can interface to mutually direct a youngster’s conduct in a friend experience. Once more, this study is extensively later and similarly also distributed in a broadly regarded peer-checked on diary for youngster brain research: Child Development. Provisos to the validity of this study are the work of a sketchy scale for estimating compassion factors (the IPPA), just as the nearly little example size (just 175 youngsters). In any case, the review’s discoveries on the significance of different elements (like the hesitant feeling of responsibility) in the connection among compassion and prosocial practices will demonstrate exceptionally applicable to my White Paper’s conversation of companion collaborations and the youngster’s interior experience. This article interfaces very well with my other exploration on reluctant feelings; related, these sources give a more grounded comprehension of the inward experience a youngster goes through in specific social conditions and circumstances.

This question has been answered.

Get Answer
WeCreativez WhatsApp Support
Our customer support team is here to answer your questions. Ask us anything!
👋 Hi, Welcome to Compliant Papers.