Sample Solution
The Epic of Sunjata, an African epic from the Mali Empire, and The Epic of Gilgamesh, an ancient Mesopotamian epic poem, share many similarities in terms of their themes and moral lessons. Firstly, they both feature a heroic protagonist who overcomes great obstacles to achieve his goals; in the case of Sunjata it is the title character himself while for Gilgamesh it is the titular king. Both characters embark on quests to prove themselves against forces beyond their control such as gods and monsters.
Both epics emphasize the value of friendship between two or more characters; this can be seen through Sunjata’s partnership with Sumanguru or Gilgamesh’s close relationship with Enkidu. These relationships are often tested by trials that teach each individual about loyalty and perseverance even when all seems lost. Additionally, both stories focus heavily on mortality due to their protagonists’ obsession with achieving immortality through various means despite knowing that death is inevitable (Levin et al., 2014). This element contributes to a sense of tragedy that pervades throughout both epics regardless of any victories achieved along the way.
Finally, these epics also have similar messages about justice being served; for example in Sunjata we see how even after conquering his enemy he chooses to forgive him instead of killing him thus teaching us something about mercy (Omotoso 2020). Similarly in Gilgamesh we witness how Hubaba is punished for disobeying Ea’s instructions despite being promised divine rewards if he cooperates (Alster 2012). In both cases justice is portrayed as a necessary part of life rather than revenge being glorified which gives readers valuable insight into these cultures.
In conclusion, there are many similarities between The Epic Of Sunjata and The Epic Of Gilgamesh; not only do they have similar themes but also share moral lessons regarding loyalty, mortality and justice which make them invaluable cultural artifacts that still resonate today.
n reaction to the emergency, the world czars have been utilizing a combination of promulgation, concealment of political opponents, and development of political powers. As a familiar proverb goes, “Never let a decent starvation go to squander”, numerous pioneers have been effective in their power snatches. Pandemic has empowered the world chiefs to legitimize the utilization of leader powers, keep individuals, and encroach on the opportunities of articulation. Hungary has passed another regulation that awards its State head Victor Orban the ability to suspend the nation’s current regulations. An endless Highly sensitive situation has been proclaimed in Hungary, shortening the opportunity of articulation and punishing those breaking quarantine orders. Philippines council has conceded President Rodrigo Duterte with crisis powers. What’s more, the President has forced show no mercy orders of those not following the quarantine standards. In Egypt, compound fighting soldiers, clad in defensive suit have been conveyed to clean suburbia. Pandemic has offered a chance for the majority rule state run administrations to boycott public gatherings, quarantine, close lines, limit exchange, force limitations on development, and blue pencil media. History likewise proposes that after an emergency, the state doesn’t abandon all the ground it had gotten. In this manner, it is basic to guess the sort of state we would live in after the emergency.
There has likewise been an ascent during the time spent ‘othering’ with the flare-up of Coronavirus pandemic. Rather than making a move to embrace and support each other, the country states have turned into the center point of xenophobia. Indeed, even as the Covid spread across the globe, reports of bigotry towards East Asians have been on the ascent in the Western majority rule governments. The Leader of US, Donald Trump, has over and over alluded to the Covid as ‘Chinese Infection’. Xenophobia has turned into a negligible instrument for states and their residents to variety reactions as for the pandemic. Media likewise assumes a significant part in the making of ‘the other’, as a differentiation to oneself. Xenophobia deliberately empowers the social disgrace towards others in the public eye. The second a pandemic is regionalised and slandered, mankind will experience a miserable end.
Researchers across the globe have given their decision on a post-pandemic world, with many insisting that the “world will be less open, prosperous, and free”. A few researchers accept that China would ascend as another worldwide power; and some others have composed an eulogy to hyper-globalization. Environmental change, for good, will acquire spotlight in a post-pandemic world. It is fascinating to perceive how emergency itself works out over the timeframe to give a certifiable response. One of the relevant ends that could be attracted with reaction to pandemic is the ineptness of the multitude of Legislatures to deal with an emergency of this size.
A pandemic-State will constantly be soiled by the ascent of dictatorship, reconnaissance, and xenophobia. Be that as it may, such a State won’t be reasonable for a post-emergency time. We want to hold in line the force of States in a post-pandemic culture. Joined Countries, as an organization, has neglected to give an aggregate worldwide reaction. Its downfall appear to be clear, like never before. It shouldn’t mean an end to ‘worldwide administration’. We want establishments with vigorous and organized type of worldwide administration instruments. A world government with organized power-imparting to country states would be a refined option for the human culture. Such an administration would require enforceable purview on issues that compromise humankind,
